This is really bizarre. Like everyone has said, beers are not distilled. Whiskey originated from the Celts distilling beer, just like brandy originated from the Romans distilling wine. Most whiskey around the world is primarily made from barley. Scotch, Irish, Canadian, Japanese, etc. Primarily barley. True, there are no hops in whiskey, but hops were not used in beer when whiskey was first invented. And in most parts of the world, the first large step of making whiskey is making old-fashioned beer (that is not meant to be drank). For other ingredients, bourbon is the only whiskey in the world that I can think of which is primarily corn (at least 51% by US law). There is, of course, rye whiskey too (which is mainly an American and Canadian style of whiskey), which is primarily rye. And on and on. But I'm digressing.
As a long time fan of distilled drinks (whiskey, brandy, rum, vodka, tequila, gin, etc.), I can say that, even if a distilled beverage (which beer is not) was un-distilled, it would not be able to be called the same thing. For example, un-distilled brandy is wine, but it would be deceptive to call wine "un-distilled brandy."
How do they think that a 6.9% ABV beer is going to take the spirits market where 40% ABV is the lowest and can go all the way up to 96% ABV (neutral grain spirits)? There are liquor drinkers like myself who love beer as well, but most of us are not attracted by a beer if it supposedly is similar to a spirit. Plus spirits tend to be expensive. Miller is cheap as dirt. Confusing stuff...