cuisinechemist, your thinking seems correct and spurred a little research on my end.
After reading over half of the pages in this thread, I have have some ideas as to why the addition of yeast improves ethanol production, why an open fermentation (with no airlock) seems to work well for rice wine production, and why a fermentation with an airlock also works well. I'll present my ideas first and the rationale second because the microbiology will bore some folks to death.
Thoughts about rice wine fermentations - Based on my biology background and skimming research papers, I think that:
1. Use of an airlock vs an open fermentation may affect metabolites produced. I suspect that an airlock results in a fermentation with a "cleaner" flavor profile and a lesser chance of contamination from bacteria.
2. Ferment on the colder side will reduce production of lactic acid and other undesirable "off-flavor" compounds (potentially acetate as well), and will reduce the chance of bacterial contamination.
3. Make certain that both yeast and fungi are present in the fermentation. There is no harm in adding supplemental yeast, especially yeasts with high alcohol tolerance.
That said, I will be trying side-by-side batches of rice wine with and without airlocks to see if there is a difference in the final product!
Microbiolgical background - In case you care about the reasoning for my ideas:
1. Filamentous fungi can produce a rice wine on their own without yeast. Some, if not all fungi used for rice wine can produce ethanol under both aerobic and anerobic conditions, but have a limited or lesser tolerance for ethanol than yeast, especially at higher temperatures (a).
2. Rice wine cannot be produced without fungi because yeast lack the enzymes to break down complex carbohydrates and starches into fermentable mono and disaccharides.
3. The addition of yeast
and fungi improves the conversion of carbohydrates to ethanol, resulting in a higher ABV. (a)
4. An open fermentation without an airlock allows for production of ethanol through both aerobic (fungi) and anaerobic (fungi and yeast) pathways. However, the risk of lactic acid production from fungi and/or contaminating bacteria is higher as production of lactic acid is more energetically favorable through an aerobic pathway (b). Lactic acid production is also greater with increasing fermentation temperature (d).
5. The acetone or "solvent" flavors sometimes observed in a young rice wine will clear up over time. Fungi can produce acetate during a fermentation but it is consumed once glucose is depleted (c). Production of acetate is greater with increasing fermentation temperature (d).
I must add the caveat that I made some rather broad generalizations about fungal metabolism and didn't specifically look up the strains common to rice wine fermentation.
References -
(a):
http://bmcbiotechnol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12896-015-0130-3
(b)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic_organism
(c)
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijmicro/2009/571383/
(d)
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/426929/ <- this paper is a goldmine of information on optimization of yeast growth and ethanol production in rice wine!