It's a form of bartering at that point. The ingredients are the item of value. You're not paying the money you would generally pay for those ingredients, which gives them an inherent value, in exchange you're giving him beer.
If it harms no one but avoids being taxed by big Fed...it must be illegal!
He gives you grain, you give him nothing.
You make beer with the grain.
You give him the grain back in beer form, he gives you nothing.
Gifting back and forth, maybe. But bartering? That's a stretch. To qualify as barter, both parties have to benefit in some way.
I could understand it if maybe he bought you two 50# sacks of 2-row, you made him 10 gallons of a blonde, and kept the grain.
tennesseean_87 said:I could definitely be wrong, but I don't see how this is bartering. You're donating your time and effort to brew for him. You're getting nothing back. He bought the ingredients for his beer. Nothing is yours. As mentioned, if he bought you more ingredients than you used, that would be bartering, but I don't see it here. You gain nothing in the transaction.
It's as much a public safety issue as it is a taxation issue.
I, for one, am glad that the government prevents dirty old man Joe's bathtub gin from landing on my grocery store shelf.
Being in the legal field, I say you give him all the beer he wants. It is a great gift and thus legal. If he gives you a great gift of cash or whatever, that is his choice. When granny gave you a card with a $100 bill the government never bothered with it, not that they wouldn't if yet could.
You are not selling him beer at all. The other way around it if you feel guilty is that you gave him the beer but he paid for the ingredients.
But I like the free lap dance option.
Cheers
Can you expound on this one?
He bought the ingredients, you brewed it into beer, and returned the beer to him.
No money or item of value changed hands. What's the problem with this one?
Every time this topic comes up, I love all the people who think they can come up with a crafty way to make the transaction not technically a "sale". Pretty bottles, coincidental gifts, markup on ingredients...
This is not how our legal system works.
You must not be very good in your field. Most states it's illegal to give homebrew away. It is for personal and family consumption, a lot of states do make exceptions for contest and tastings. To give someone blanket advice that they can give away homebrew while saying you are in the legal field is just bad.
And Calif is one of the states where it is only for family consumption
100% NOT TRUE!! In fact I am going to the Southern California Homebrewers Festival in a few weeks. Something like 500 beers being served.
Tell him he can't pay you, but he could buy you equipment to help you in the task. If you are like most home brewers, you probably have your eye on some upgrades or need new fermenting vessels or something.
Would that not be a tasting?
Yooper said:In most states, the brewer made the homebrew and thus "owns" it. In some states, you can't even gift homebrew, or take it out of your home to your boat or to your campsite.
In my state, I can give away something like 20 gallons of homebrew per year. It used to be a 6 pack. In some states, it's only legal to remove homebrew from the brewer's home for competitions.
If someone bought ingredients, they can give them to a homebrewer for a gift, no problem. But the brewer usually can't gift back beer, unless the state law allows for the gifting of homebrew from a brewer's home.
It's important to check with your state laws. Most places that have a liquor license will not allow homebrew into it.
Every time this topic comes up, I love all the people who think they can come up with a crafty way to make the transaction not technically a "sale". Pretty bottles, coincidental gifts, markup on ingredients...
This is not how our legal system works.
Every time this topic comes up Im amazed at how many people actually believe the government will prosecute them for bartering small amounts of homebrew.
It is a tasting. I was disputing the fact that it is for family/personal use only. So talk about legal loopholes.. The Southern California Homebrewers Festival is a perfect example. It features over 30 homebrew clubs serving over 500 beers and that's a conservative guess. The ticket price is 40 bucks. But wait....what you buy online is not a "ticket" but rather an annual membership to the California Homebrewers Assoc. The festival is "free" if you are a "member". Anyone can be a "member" with the caveat that "memberships" are not sold the day of the festival.
§ 23356.2. Beer; manufacture for personal or family use; exemption
No license or permit shall be required for the manufacture of beer for personal or family use, and not for sale, by a person over the age of 21 years. The aggregate amount of beer with respect to any household shall not exceed (a) 200 gallons per calendar year if there are two or more adults in such household, or (b) 100 gallons per calendar year if there is only one adult in such household.
Any beer manufactured pursuant to this section may be removed from the premises where manufactured for use in competition at organized affairs, exhibitions or competitions, including homemakers' contests, tastings, or judgings.
Who said they will?
I have read several of these threads with people replying that the ATF , ABC or local authorities are trolling the forum just waiting to pounce on a home brewer selling homebrew.
Oh, right..."several threads". Let me know if you find an example.![]()
I don't know if I can find an example but I do find it hilarious that some people on this board really do think that this forum is monitored. Just read some of the first posts.
The laws are written the way they are so that someone can't run an unlicensed brewery and try to sell the beer on a commercial level. That is what the government is concerned about. They don't care, as evidenced by sheer lack of enforcement, if someone brews some beer for a friends wedding and is compensated in some way. In fact how is that any different than your friend paying you gas money to drive him to the airport? You are receiving compensation for something that you are not licensed to do i.e. transport fare paying passengers. Now lets stop and use a little common sense here..does anyone really believe that is what the law is concerned with? Of course not!
Beer_Eugenics said:I have read several of these threads with people replying that the ATF , ABC or local authorities are trolling the forum just waiting to pounce on a home brewer “selling” homebrew.