I'm hoping someone might save me some time from reading 33 pages. Has the recipe been altered significantly from the original? Any thoughts on using Windsor or S-04 instead of US-05?
I brew per the original recipe with outstanding results. Only thing I would consider is tweaking the grain bill to match your efficiency.
I'm hoping someone might save me some time from reading 33 pages. Has the recipe been altered significantly from the original? Any thoughts on using Windsor or S-04 instead of US-05?
After 3 weeks in the bottle:
http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/attachment.php?attachmentid=79669&d=1383071550
insanim8er said:It looks great, but what co2 volume did you do? It looks heavy on the co2. I generally keep mine pretty low to get a creamier mouth feel.
But this couldn't have come at a better time. It's just the motivation I needed. My 10 gallon batch has been in primary for just over three weeks now. Time to get them into serving kegs.
It's actually a little (very, very little) under-carbed, IMO. I aimed for 2.0, but I think I was closer to 1.8/9.
A possible reason for the way it looks is I had a really bad pour, mainly so I could get a good look at the head![]()
Been enjoying this for a couple days.
It came out as an imperial because my efficiency was too good.
At ~9% abv, I'm a little sad I only have 10 gallons.
So damn good...
What was your efficiency...
I made this and it is awesome. But it did not carb up and get the head retention I would like. Does lactose mess with that?
It won't mess with carbonation, but milk stout doesn't really have much head retention. Not even commercial. It probably is due to the lactose since there is a lot of oats in the recipe, but it could also have to do with the low carbonation level for the style. I get a nice creamy head that dissipates relatively quick, but I get lacing down the glass.
As for carbonation, I'm note sure how you carb, or how long you let it sit... Etc, so there could be another reason for that. I force carbed mine in a keg. Set it and left it for about 2 weeks or so in the fridge. I carb pretty low on the spectrum for the styleabout 1.8. This gives it a nice creamy feel with just enough bubble to not feel flat.
nolabrew85 said:Although I think this is a great recipe with a lot of good attributes with taste, I think it may be a little on the sweet side for my personal taste. This makes me want to try it with half the lactose and also upping the IBUs to about 29-30. Has anyone played with it like that?
I love Left Handed Nitro Milk Stout! Is this the same or is there a regular Left Handed Milk Stout made by them? If so, I've never seen it. I know on the bottle of the Nitro one it says to pour hard so you get the layering aspect of a nitro pour. When I do that I get a nice thick head and lasts for the whole duration of the beer.
I can't wait to brew this one up. Perfect for winter!!
Left hand makes a non-nitro in bottles. It's the only one I tried. The head was exactly as mine is with this recipe. I actually prefer this recipe over LH. It just seems smother to me. It is a good winter warmer, that's why I make 10 gallons. Problem is I end up taking it to Holliday parties in my 3 gallon keg. And of course friends and family all want bottles. I might need to make 15 gal next year.
bobeer said:I love Left Handed Nitro Milk Stout! Is this the same or is there a regular Left Handed Milk Stout made by them? If so, I've never seen it. I know on the bottle of the Nitro one it says to pour hard so you get the layering aspect of a nitro pour. When I do that I get a nice thick head and lasts for the whole duration of the beer. I can't wait to brew this one up. Perfect for winter!!
The nitro bottle is relatively new. They do make a "regular" version that is quite good. On a side note, unless you have a special strain of yeast or a nitro tap system, you're yeast are creating CO2 for carbonation.
insanim8er said:All beer is carbonated with c02. Even nitro beer. Nitro doesn't absorb into the beer. It's used to serve. It allow for a heavy flow with out adding additional carbonation by having the co2 turned up, so you can force the beer through the faucet to get a thick creamy head. Nitro beer in cans is nothing more than a ping pong ball with a pin hole in it (called a widget). They fill the can with nitro and that forces the beer to go into the ball through the small hole. When it's opened, the energy and pressure is released creating foam... Thick frothy dense foam. The beer is still carbonated with co2.
Go get two bottles of the left hand nitro milk stout and explain it to me after you pour one gently and one vigorously per instructions. No can. No widget. Nitro pour, just like the milk stout or a Guinness on tap. I'm not a chemist, but it does seem like they got nitrogen to dissolve into solution to me.
That's how Guinness does it. Nitrogen IS NOT easily absorbed into beer. I promise you will not be able to do it... But apparently LH has a patent on their technique.
Pretty sure I recall one of the Left Hand guys said they didn't patent it to prevent everyone from learning their secret methods.
Well it could be true... I just read a article on it I never had their nitro as LH is not available in Oregon. I had to go to Washington for it. And even there it's limited.
The article said they did, but I was thinking if they did, it would have to be released how they do it. I've yet to find anything on it, so you're probably right.
They have articles saying stupid stuff like they add It with tweezers, so sounds like it's kept under wraps and not patented. They should patent it, if they can, and sell the rights.
Or just keep the rights. Sorry you can't readily get it. We have it everywhere in Ohio. When you get a chance to pick one up for a reasonable price, it's quite cool to pour and see a beer settle just like a Guinness