propush
Active Member
Greetings!
I have limited number of temp controlled chambers, and a desire to brew gazillion liters of beer regardless.
I do not want to skip on lagers though, as that is the whole reason I got another temp controlled chamber. However, soon, I will have more buckets of new lager batches which needs to be lagerd - so I will have to use both chambers, and halt all further brews until the lagering is done.
However, if I could stop the process for a week, or delay this new batch for a week or two and keep it at room temp (19-22C, 66-72F) - then I can keep making ales, letting the lager warm for one week / delay the lagering start, then placing it back.
Apart from making the whole process longer, due to the 1 week 'off', is there a problem doing something like this?
If you choose to answer please state if and why there is a difference between delaying the start of the lagering process, and stopping in the middle then resuming a week / few days later.
Thanks in advance!
I have limited number of temp controlled chambers, and a desire to brew gazillion liters of beer regardless.
I do not want to skip on lagers though, as that is the whole reason I got another temp controlled chamber. However, soon, I will have more buckets of new lager batches which needs to be lagerd - so I will have to use both chambers, and halt all further brews until the lagering is done.
However, if I could stop the process for a week, or delay this new batch for a week or two and keep it at room temp (19-22C, 66-72F) - then I can keep making ales, letting the lager warm for one week / delay the lagering start, then placing it back.
Apart from making the whole process longer, due to the 1 week 'off', is there a problem doing something like this?
If you choose to answer please state if and why there is a difference between delaying the start of the lagering process, and stopping in the middle then resuming a week / few days later.
Thanks in advance!