germanbrewing
Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2016
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 3
Agree! Another important point is that LoDO offers the opportunity to produce a different beer character and quality. Please notice that I didn't say that it was necessarily 'better'. We know that we can make pretty good beers without LoDO, but I concede that we might find that the methods might make beers better in some ways. I think this is worth exploring.
"Different" is right on. "better" is up to the individual. It seems like 95% of the homebrew world doesn't care for beers from Freising, for example, so your mileage will definitely vary. For me, the most significant benefit here has been getting light kilned malt to taste more like I want it to, and noble hops to pop more like they should. Less muted and dull. But for me, that is a significant step in the right direction.
The analogy we used for a long time was that we were all brewing 80-90% beers. They could win medals, people generally liked or really liked them. But they weren't quite up to par with the originals, they always came out flat and dull next to commercial examples. I'd been trying to break that barrier of getting the right fresh flavor. I have a beer on tap that is a funky mix of Pils malt, light kilned Munich and Carared...this turned out (at least for me) to be a horrible mess done without low O2 (I have both non and low O2 versions). But brewed low O2, the flavors are clean, malty and fresh. Malt aroma is clean and fresh as well.
That said, I agree that it is worth exploring and I'm excited to see what folks who try it find and come up with.