SeanMcEntee
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 5
where did he go?
I expect we'll hear from him again in about eight years.

where did he go?
Be weary of bottle bombs when u crack those bottles, especially if u recently added yeast or sugar.1030 is really high for a finishing gravity!
I've sadly experienced beer geysers when i bottled a beer at 1020
If a beer has a high enough starting gravity, it can end at 1.030 and be fine. Depends on the beer you made.
CO2 is heavier, but gasses will mix (diffuse) with time.
How did you forget about that for 8.5 years?
I doubt a beer in secondary for 8+ years has any fermentables left (whether due to original yeast or any infection organisms that got in through a dry airlock), gushers would only be possible from an infection and bottling above FG.
I've had barley wine from the store, but it was crap in comparison to home brewed. So far, in my experience in home brewing, all store bought beer is crap, and every single beer I have ever brewed is much better. (?)
I forgot about a 3 gal carboy of Mead in a back closet for three years. Out of site out of mind. It was sealed though and tastes great, what a find,,, Just drink it man.
I'm guessing it will taste horrible..... generally beer doesn't age very well. If you're lucky, you might be able to use it on your French fries lol.
Strong beer ages beautifully. Ive a couple of crates of Rochefort 10 that have aged aged for 8 years - date on them is 25 Dec 2008. We open a couple every Christmas and compare them with fresh ones and the aged are superb. At 5 years they were amazing; port wine, dried fruit, delicate spice, and they keep getting better.
LOL,
I did say generally.. Rochefort is a premium Belgian beer which is properly stored with live yeast. Belgian beers tend to age well but only for a certain amount of time. I tried a 20 year old corked bottled of Belgian trippel and it was flat and tasted like bile. This was a properly stored bottle. Now imagine this guy's fully exposed barley wine.. eek!
Its a bit of a stretch to say "fully exposed" as it was in a glass carboy with stopper & airlock (though dry much of the time)
Its a bit of a stretch to say "fully exposed" as it was in a glass carboy with stopper & airlock (though dry much of the time) in an undisturbed, cool but controlled part of the house. This wasn't a Belgian open fermentation experiment :>
I did drink a bottle of it the other night and could still sense no off-flavors. I have tasted beers with astringent / metallic off-flavors before. Its very malty but dry, alcoholic, and I can clearly taste the dark toasted grains I steeped when it was made. As someone mentioned, however, there is no contribution to aroma from hops, which I would have expected on a "normal" brew. It is quite drinkable.
This got me wondering:
After 8 years I would imagine a significant fraction of the ethanol may have evaporated away due to the fact that its vapor pressure is significantly higher than that of water. How detectable would you say the alcohol is in the finished product, if at all?
Significant fraction = oxymoron. Im not being rude or obtuse, it made me smile. Jumbo shrimp is one of my favourites.
no it isn't.Significant fraction = oxymoron.
no it isn't.
1/10,000,000 might be insignificant, while 1/5 is significant. losing one ten-millionth of the alcohol would not be significant while losing 20% of the alcohol would be significant, noticeable, etc.
or are you stating that only wholes/integers are important? "until all the alcohol is gone, none is gone"?
I'm guessing it will taste horrible.
It would have been fine if the airlock hadn't dried out. Now it will be heavily oxidized, all the hop aromas are pretty much gone and generally beer doesn't age very well. If you're lucky, you might be able to use it on your French fries lol.