• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

How should a Berliner Weisse Taste?

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Morkin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
318
Reaction score
2
Location
Missouri
Berliner Weisse is the ONLY beer I've ever made that I have never tried. I have searched and searched and cannot find an example.

I had originally thought that my Berliner Weisse should taste like a sour wheat beer. The sourness according to BJCP is not like a Lambic or Flander Red, which are the only sours I've had.

So how is the sour supposed to taste? My Berliner Weisse tastes amazing to me, but I want it to be true to the style, and may want to enter it into competition.

I associate sour flavor in beers to fruit tartness, a lip puckering flavor. But that is not what I am supposed to get right?

Anyone have any thoughts on what it's supposed to taste like? Thanks.
 
I have yet to try a BerlW but it is something I am have considered brewing to be able to.

That is, until I started getting a concensus that it is more of a fruit flavoreed beer than a sour (vinous) character.

I'd prolly love it but, 5 gallons of beer you hate is a LOT of beer.
 
I have yet to try a BerlW but it is something I am have considered brewing to be able to.

That is, until I started getting a concensus that it is more of a fruit flavoreed beer than a sour (vinous) character.

I'd prolly love it but, 5 gallons of beer you hate is a LOT of beer.

I wouldn't call it fruit flavored, definitely very light and tart. Although the 1809 Berliner Weisse I've had does have a light sour apple flavor that I thought was really good. Still not what I would call "fruity" though...
 
Thats what I have now. It's sour, but almost a grainy/wheat sour.

It almost tastes like a highly carbonated Boulevard Wheat with Sour added, very light and refreshing. Bottled in Belgian Bottles and can easily drink the whole thing in an hour.
 
I wouldn't call it fruit flavored, definitely very light and tart. Although the 1809 Berliner Weisse I've had does have a light sour apple flavor that I thought was really good. Still not what I would call "fruity" though...

1809 was recently described to me as a "girly lemonade beer" = fruit.

A highly carbonated shandy does tend to be how BW is described.
 
Where are you in MO? Most places in kc carry kindle. 1809 is much higher gravity than what berlin breweries are doing.
 
BW should be 3-4% ABV. Never had the 1809, but if it's heavier and sweet it is not to style.

If a BW tastes like a shandy, it is most definitely not to style.
 
I like to refer to it as the lemonade of the beer world. Essentially what Arturo said. crisp, light and tart.
 
I''ve only tasted the wort, as it is carbonating right now. We described it as crisp, with a light bite. Sort of like a watered down lemonade. That makes it sound terrible but it really was quite tasty. Can't wait to try it.
 
I understand the lemonade comparison, but it's a bit misleading. Maybe if the lemonade was made without sugar and didn't taste like lemons.
 
I'm in Hermann Missouri, hour outside of Jefferson City. I'll have to look it up when I'm in KC Next.
 
Berliner Weisse should be extremely sour, more than even many lambics. It should also have a little brett flavour.

The 1809 is unlike a genuine Berliner Weisse in almost every respect - colour, strength, mouthfeel, carbonation, level of sourness. It will give you no idea of how the real thing tastes.
 
Berliner Weisse should be extremely sour, more than even many lambics. It should also have a little brett flavour.

The 1809 is unlike a genuine Berliner Weisse in almost every respect - colour, strength, mouthfeel, carbonation, level of sourness. It will give you no idea of how the real thing tastes.

No.

A berliner should have a lactic sourness, but not as acidic or sour as many lambics. It also CAN have brett, but it isn't a necessity. Both of your defining guidelines are optional for the style.
 
No.

A berliner should have a lactic sourness, but not as acidic or sour as many lambics. It also CAN have brett, but it isn't a necessity. Both of your defining guidelines are optional for the style.

What are you basing that on? I've had at least 6 different Berliner Weisses that were brewed in Berlin. All were very, very sour. As sour as the very sourest lambics I've had.

As for the brett that comes form the book "Die Berliner Weisse" published by the VLB (the brewing school in Berlin) page 87. It says that a certain concentration of brett is necessary to attain the correct aroma for a Berliner Weisse.
 
What are you basing that on? I've had at least 6 different Berliner Weisses that were brewed in Berlin. All were very, very sour. As sour as the very sourest lambics I've had.

As for the brett that comes form the book "Die Berliner Weisse" published by the VLB (the brewing school in Berlin) page 87. It says that a certain concentration of brett is necessary to attain the correct aroma for a Berliner Weisse.

:rockin: Refutation with references. I love it
 
In VooDoo's defense, not that he needs it from me;

From the BJCP:

Flavor: Clean lactic sourness dominates and can be quite strong, although not so acidic as a lambic. Some complementary bready or grainy wheat flavor is generally noticeable. Hop bitterness is very low. A mild Brettanomyces character may be detected, as may a restrained fruitiness (both are optional). No hop flavor. No diacetyl or DMS.

So, both are correct depending on what aspect of timeline you accept. The twop being traditional and ameri-cepted.
 
No cans. No worms. Depending on perspective it appears they are both correct in what a Berliner Wess should be. Not much different than that of style regarding decoction. Decoction is the tradition but infusion is accepted practice and wins comps and medals even in commercial circuits. Right is perspective.


The BJCP and the text reference descriptions seem heavenly. Word of mouth doesn't measure up.
 
In VooDoo's defense, not that he needs it from me;

From the BJCP:

Flavor: Clean lactic sourness dominates and can be quite strong, although not so acidic as a lambic. Some complementary bready or grainy wheat flavor is generally noticeable. Hop bitterness is very low. A mild Brettanomyces character may be detected, as may a restrained fruitiness (both are optional). No hop flavor. No diacetyl or DMS.

So, both are correct depending on what aspect of timeline you accept. The twop being traditional and ameri-cepted.

Are you trying to say that the BJCP is an equal authority to the VLB when it comes to Berliner Weisse? The VLB* is an organisation that has more than 100 years of experience researching and documenting Berliner Weisse.

I don't understand what you mean about a timeline. The study that determined the role of brett in the flavour of Berliner Weisse was made in the 1980's.

Call me crazy, but I think a Berlin brewing school trumps the BJCP in expertise when it comes to a Berlin beer style.

Do I know what I'm talking about? Read this and make your own mind up:

http://barclayperkins.blogspot.com/search/label/Berliner Weisse


* Versuchs- und Lehranstalt für Brauerei in Berlin
http://www.vlb-berlin.org

They've published some great books in their time, including the seminal "Die Herstellung Obergährige Biere".
 
I want that Berliner Weisse book. Too bad Amazon.de doesn't seem to carry it! I'll have to do some digging...
 
So, both are correct depending on what aspect of timeline you accept. The twop being traditional and ameri-cepted.


Are you trying to say that the BJCP is an equal authority to the VLB when it comes to Berliner Weisse?


I think the point is that there are two distinct styles of Berliner Weisse. Are you are saying, patto, that the BJCP style is invalid? Perhaps we should stop brewing west coast IPAs as well in favor of the British style?
 
I think the point is that there are two distinct styles of Berliner Weisse. Are you are saying, patto, that the BJCP style is invalid? Perhaps we should stop brewing west coast IPAs as well in favor of the British style?

Right . . . So there's an American style of Berliner Weisse. Exactly who brews that and what are its origins?

The original question was "What does Berliner Weisse taste like?" Naively, I thought that meant beer brewed in Berlin.
 
The Bruery has an excellent example of the American style, Hottenroth.

For my palate, the American style is preferred. Even the Berliners, more often than not, drink original style with sweeteners.
 
From most commercial examples I have had in the US, they are either not nearly sour enough or have some garbagey aromas that are probably a result of an improperly conducted sour mash.

For me, a berliner should be firmly sour, but not so sour that it is unpleasant to drink without syrup. This still allows for quite a bit of leeway, as I have made berliners at home that ended up around 3.15pH and still very enjoyable to drink, just not by the liter. It should have some dough-like aroma and flavor, it should be very dry, perhaps a light funk to add a slight bit of complexity. I like my berliners low in alcohol, around 3-3.5 ABV.

I have yet to find a commercial example of berliner weisse that I really love. Easily the most common problem is just not sour enough.
 
The Bruery has an excellent example of the American style, Hottenroth.

For my palate, the American style is preferred. Even the Berliners, more often than not, drink original style with sweeteners.

But "Berliner" means "from Berlin" (or jelly donut in a common urban myth).

The Bruery has made a nice beer with quite a bit of brett character and relatively little lactic character. You like it and I like it but it isn't like Berlin wheat beers.

I like Consecration (or whatever) but it would probably annoy Europeans if I started claiming it was the standard for Flander's Red. I can appreciate Consecration while recognizing that it differs from the archetype (Rodenbach).

What if people started saying American IPA has to taste like Hardcore IPA (or that Hardcore is the archetype for a second equally valid version of American IPA). I think you and I would laugh.
 
Since this is a homebrewing forum in the US, the OP is probably interested in both the bjcp and vlb, but will doubtless be judged according to the bjcp shoud he/she enter it in any competition.

Since we have style mavens in each of these schools of thought, we should take advantage of discussing the differences and similarities.
 
Back
Top