maltoftheearth
Well-Known Member
I am looking to make an oatmeal stout and am curious as to the highest percent of oatmeal in the total grain bill used by HBT folks.
SpeedYellow said:Wow, 7-8% oats barely seems to deserve being called an oatmeal stout. Could you really get any use from that little? I just made a 1.105 imperial oat stout and did 14% oat, and was concerned that might even be too little. Only time will tell.
I just made a big starter. The beer was inspired by Southern Tier's Oat, which is quite nice.sethlovex said:Wow sounds awesome did you do a huge starter or double pitch?
I think 15% is probably a good number. Interestingly the article said oats provide very little oatmeal flavor, this is actually provided by the victory malt.
That is interesting. So I guess the oats are mainly there for the mouthfeel, hunh?
Thanks for the recipe from BYO, I have to smile when I see ingredients listed to the tenth decimal (e.g. "14.1".) That seems way too precise for me, I am struggling to stay in the ballpark with my gravity and bittering numbers and people are measuring to the tenth decimal. I have a long way to go.
Thanks for the advice re: percentages of grain bill for oats.
The stout I made that is currently carbonating has 15% of the bill as oatmeal. The samples that I've had have been pretty good!
considering people put 20% oats in pale ales and IPAs these days, feel free to go nutsI know I'm a few years late to this thread, but do you think 15% is a good number after you actually brewed it?
Historically oat stouts were more or less a marketing ruse by big brewers, who threw tiny amounts (<3%, often <1%) in their partigyles to allow them to bottle their stout with two labels, ordinary stout and oatmeal stout. The Barclay Perkins stout of 1928 is typical.
They were cashing in on the popularity of the oatmalt stout from Maclay of Alloa, which did have reasonable amounts of oatmalt - 13% in 1909 and up to double that in later versions. Rose & Co of Grimsby had pioneered the style with oatmeal a few years before Maclay, but lost a patent battle and seem to have faded from the scene.
They were cashing in on the popularity of the oatmalt stout from Maclay of Alloa, which did have reasonable amounts of oatmalt - 13% in 1909 and up to double that in later versions.
I pay attention to beersmith's recommendations about as often as I listen to my drunk uncle at Thanksgiving
It does effect mouthfeel though.
nah, very hard disagree. I made a 20% oat pale ale and the slick mouthfeel was astonishing. Beta glucans making it into the final product isn't just a product of grist percent. I do think that it's a misconception that oats provide a fluffy mouthfeel however.Also not as much as people think it does. I could not detect a difference in mouthfeel. Wheat does a way better job in this case.
It is also baked up by the linked articles above that there is no increase in mouthfeel below 18% weight of the grist. I could not detect anything in my 20 or 30% test batch.
Maybe that is the reason for my different experiences with oats. Maybe some oats have more beta glucan? Or maybe some off the yeasts just chop it up?I should elaborate that I've made that same malt bill numerous times, and the oat slickness occurred in maybe 25% of them. It was my standard for single hop IPAs, so I'm very familiar with it. A couple of the beers had the slickness age out but not all of them
According to a news paper report on the patent case it seems the judge upheld the Rose & Wilson patent as having come first before Alloa...
Enter your email address to join: