Well, you might consider letting it finish. The character of the beer can change greatly between now and once it is bottle conditioned. Changing it now might take it a different direction than you want to go.
Yes, I suppose patience is the better part of virtue. Not one of my strongest points
A perfect example is the fact that I periodically go look at my three GF SMaSH's and stare at them as if I could will them into action
I'm guessing that leaving it alone for now is the best choice. I've got to learn what I've made and if I tweak it will change the equation and make it harder to evaluate.
I'll probably pick up some Maltodextrin to have on hand to fix the FG if it seems necessary at bottling.
On the subject of bottling, has anyone ever used Maple sugar for priming?
You can use whatever you want for priming, the important part is accurate measurement, no matter what you use it will have almost no effect on taste.
That's good to know, as I've read(on here I believe) that it can have a huge affect ie using cane sugar vs honey vs corn sugar on the finished product. This means I can use cane sugar for priming instead of shelling out for corn without worrying about altering the character of the beer.
Bottled it last night. She finished out at 1.008. It's not at all what I was trying for but seemed drinkable even when warm and flat. A bit bitter but not American IPA level hoppy, I'd guess close to an English IPA or maybe just a bit of a Bitter, not sure though a I can't really claim to have my palette calibrated. The Honey overtones have gotten a really strong. Far more prominent than I would've expected for using a single pound. We'll see how it settles out after a couple weeks in the bottle.
Well initial results are in. Not my favorite beer by a long shot but quite drinkable. Color wise I'd call it an amber. Taste wise I'd say it's an underhopped pale with noticeable honey overtones.
Part of the reason for missing my target(a brown ale-stout) was my timidity in roasting the grains. I just never got anywhere close to the darker malts with my GF grains. Their lack of additional bitterness is likely why it comes across as underhopped.
The non GF drinkers enjoyed and it consumed it without hesitation, so I guess that's a compliment. The intended benefactor was VERY pleased(jumped up and down actually) So I'm calling it a win even if it's not what I was trying to make.
History is written by the victors right(really I meant to do that )
Well initial results are in. Not my favorite beer by a long shot but quite drinkable. Color wise I'd call it an amber. Taste wise I'd say it's an underhopped pale with noticeable honey overtones.
Part of the reason for missing my target(a brown ale-stout) was my timidity in roasting the grains. I just never got anywhere close to the darker malts with my GF grains. Their lack of additional bitterness is likely why it comes across as underhopped.
The non GF drinkers enjoyed and it consumed it without hesitation, so I guess that's a compliment. The intended benefactor was VERY pleased(jumped up and down actually) So I'm calling it a win even if it's not what I was trying to make.
History is written by the victors right(really I meant to do that )