See, I have nothing against Favre, and don't disbute he can still be a very good QB. I just disagree with you in terms of the general direction of the team. By the time the REST of the offense has improved, Favre *will* have retired and they'll be scrambling to bring in a QB. I think they - the team - would be better off perhaps sacrificing a win or two this year and trying to develop a young QB. Doesn't have to be Rodgers if he really isn't any good (in which case they blew a pretty high draft pick).
But, if Rodgers isn't the long-term solution, they could have tried to bring in someone halfway decent over the last offseason, if Favre hadn't basically held them hostage with the whole "I'm coming back, no, I'm retiring, OK, I'll come back" song-'n-dance.
I like the Pack, I like seeing them do well, and I like watching Favre - but by the time the other 44 guys are anywhere close to being playoff-caliber, Favre'll be gone and there will be a huge hole at the biggest position.
And yeah, I know - I just don't get it, right?
EDIT: Let me add something; Favre can be a very good QB in the right situation, but when he's put in a position where he HAS to be the savior every weak, he tends to struggle. He did well this week, bully for him, glad I'm not matched up against you in FFB this week - but I would be surprised if over the rest of the season, there were more games like this one than games like Week 1.