No. The only advantage the flask gives the user is that it can be mixed with one hand during titration or mixing and the neck is thin so it can be easily clamped. None of which applies to homebrewing in general.
-Jefe-
Yooper said:That, and my flask is boiled right on the stove (NOT the mason jar!) and then can go right into a ice water bath for chilling!
You might do a quick google search for 2000 ml erlenmeyer. They are half that cost online.
Seriously, the 2000ML flask is effin $40 at my LHBS. Is there any detriment to just using a half gallon mason jar thats a fraction of the cost?
All flasks are not created equal. It's like someone saying they paid $40,000 for a car and someone saying they paid $10,000 for a car. You can't make a decision until you have more information. I have two different flask's and the cheaper priced one is cheaper quality. Back to the OP question I now use a saucepan to boil my starter and pour into a flat bottom jug for the stir plate. I just got tired of watching the boil when using the flask. I really have my eye on the wife's cookie jar since the bottom is actually concave and the stir bar rides perfectly. Since it is one of the few NO you can't have it. I won' t take it, but I am keeping my eye out for a similar jar. I also use a 1 gallon pickle jar for starters. I also use it for making Sun tea.
Hooray for the jugs! (I just wanted to say that)
I like to use clear, 1-gallon growlers for most of my starters. They are cheap and give you plenty of extra headspace.
Flasks are good also for the reasons the others have mentioned but I personally prefer to use growlers like this one.
thegerm said:... but the erlenmeyer was such a huge mess every single time with boilovers to clean up on my stove.
Fermcap foam control drops are the greatest invention in history. Eliminates the boilover problem.