The Sedins tried to play more aggressive to deal with all the criticism early in game 5 and got reamed for it. That's not what they're good at, that's not what they're paid to do. Sedin was taking the punches so that it wouldn't devolve into a brawl, something he really can't afford to be in, and he had a reasonable expectation of it being stopped by a ref MUCH earlier.
I don't know if you guys have ever played hockey beyond a house league, but everybody was wrong in that thing EXCEPT Sedin. It's like an unwritten rule, you don't **** with the star players, and you don't **** with people who clearly have no intention of fighting. Ask even some of the toughest enforcers in the league... they stick to fighting there own kind, and even then, usually wait till both guys have signaled their intention before throwing down.
Agreed. It's definitely a grey area, but there is a general understanding. Depending on the team, expect some varying degrees of retaliation for messing with the star players who aren't engaging in, or responding to that kind of altercation.
With the Canucks, I'm not sure though... It's not like they have the likes of Bob Probert to lay down the enforcement. I guess we'll see if/how they retaliate. If not physically, then maybe by parading Lord Stanley's Cup downtown Vancouver. If not, then I'd say that team lacks some "depth."