Laughing_Gnome_Invisible
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2008
- Messages
- 12,262
- Reaction score
- 734
OK, I know that one-step is not the way to go, but hey, I bought a bunch of it before I read this forum, so I gotta use it up! Anyways....
In the need to improve my efficiency at bottling, I devised a new system. This system was evidently not foolproof, as I found out when I did something foolish.
The first eight 1 litre bottles that I filled still contained about 60 ml of one-step! I learned from previous panic situations that it was simply not worth panicking any more, and just carried on bottling after marking the screwed up bottles. I had assumed that they would be totally undrinkable, but was curious to find out what would happen.
Today I opened two bottles, one "contaminated" the other good. I did both a sighted tasting and a blind tasting. To my relief there was no remarkable difference. There was a difference, sure, but it was minimal. I am starting to wonder just how STUPID I need to be to screw up an extract! Admittedly it was a bitter, so harder to make a mess of than most, but even so, I proved to myself that worrying about something I can do nothing about is just not worth the energy any more.
In the need to improve my efficiency at bottling, I devised a new system. This system was evidently not foolproof, as I found out when I did something foolish.
Today I opened two bottles, one "contaminated" the other good. I did both a sighted tasting and a blind tasting. To my relief there was no remarkable difference. There was a difference, sure, but it was minimal. I am starting to wonder just how STUPID I need to be to screw up an extract! Admittedly it was a bitter, so harder to make a mess of than most, but even so, I proved to myself that worrying about something I can do nothing about is just not worth the energy any more.