I've heard that Nitrogen/Guinness Gas it is not able to empty as many kegs per tank, is this true? If so, how many kegs does it typically empty when compared to CO2?
Just giving a ballpark estimate how many fewer kegs does beer gas empty when compared to CO2?
Can't answer the number of kegs question. But with beer gas (mixed CO2 & N2), you (should) carbonate with pure CO2, so you only use the beer gas to serve, which reduces consumption compared to carbonating and serving. You certainly don't want to be purging kegs with beer gas.
Please correct me if I'm wrong (I love learning!), but I thought the whole reason for using beer gas is because you actually want the N2 to diffuse into the beer while carbonating. I was under the impression that the restrictor plates in the stout faucet causes the N2 (and some CO2, but N2 is less readily diffused) to come out of solution, causing the tiny micro bubbles. If anything, I would have thought the advice would have been to carb with beer gas, but serve with CO2.
When people talk of nitro, its a reference to the type of gas used in the carbonation process. It means the difference between the creamier nitrogen beers (N2) and their lively, prickly CO2 counterparts. A typical nitrogenated beer contains about 70 percent nitrogen and 30 percent carbon dioxide.
Nitrogen is largely insoluble in liquid, which is what contributes to the thick mouth feel. This effect is helped by a special piece of tap equipment known as a restrictor plate that forces the beer through tiny holes before it lands in the glass. That process causes the rising effect that is topped with the head.
Please correct me if I'm wrong (I love learning!), but I thought the whole reason for using beer gas is because you actually want the N2 to diffuse into the beer while carbonating. I was under the impression that the restrictor plates in the stout faucet causes the N2 (and some CO2, but N2 is less readily diffused) to come out of solution, causing the tiny micro bubbles. If anything, I would have thought the advice would have been to carb with beer gas, but serve with CO2.
Therefore conversely, I would think that if you carbed with just CO2 and then used the beer gas to push, wouldn't just the CO2 come out of solution at the faucet (since no N2 has had time to diffuse into the beer), which would just cause a lot of normal looking foam?
There is an incredible amount of BS published about N2 and beer. There are not many chemists or physicists writing about beer apparently. From my analysis above: the statement "A typical nitrogenated beer contains about 70 percent nitrogen and 30 percent carbon dioxide." is just plain wrong. It's not even close to reality.Not that I'm saying you're wrong, but this article would seem to indicate that carbing with beer gas is the desired element:
http://www.craftbeer.com/craft-beer-muses/good-beer-gas-nitro-beers-explainedWhen people talk of nitro, its a reference to the type of gas used in the carbonation process. It means the difference between the creamier nitrogen beers (N2) and their lively, prickly CO2 counterparts. A typical nitrogenated beer contains about 70 percent nitrogen and 30 percent carbon dioxide.
Nitrogen is largely insoluble in liquid, which is what contributes to the thick mouth feel. This effect is helped by a special piece of tap equipment known as a restrictor plate that forces the beer through tiny holes before it lands in the glass. That process causes the rising effect that is topped with the head.
The widget is basically a foam generator. It is probably engineered to create smaller bubbles than a normal pour generates. The N2 insures higher pressure in the cold can than you would have with just CO2, and that makes the widget a better foam generator. The beers are also probably designed to have much more stable heads, so the normal consolidation of small bubbles into large bubbles is slowed way down. The N2 might play some role in the foam creation, but it is only about 5% of the gas coming out of the beer. The low carbonation typical of beers served on N2 has a major effect on the flavor perception as you don't have as much carbonic acid bite.Thanks for the info. So nitrogen has absolutely no part in creating the dense head that we typically see with the stout. So, slightly off topic, but what's the deal with the widgets in beer cans then? I would assume that if the N2 was just to allow a higher PSI pour, it wouldn't be needed or useful in a can application.
Checked out that thread, and the experiences with pure N2 seem to be mixed, and conflicting. Since it's all anecdotal, with no fundamental science behind it, I'm not ready to buy into the pure N2 being a workable process. With 45 psi of pure N2, you might get something on the order of 0.08 volumes dissolved. Can't see how you could get any kind of head from that.https://www.homebrewtalk.com/showthread.php?t=453918
Some people on this thread here claim they are getting the guinness cascade off of 100% nitrogen ( I don't particularly beleive it myself )
Given they are doing coffee and not beer.
I myself both carb and serve with beergas. (70/30 mix)
My system has a leak SOMEWHERE in it so i unhook the gas after carbing but will hit it if the `pour` becomes slow/lacking head.
Usually it comes out 90% foam at first, then eventually get's that magic cascade pour for about 2 pints, then starts running slower with lacking head even without tilting the beerglass. Doing this i want to say i've burned through at least 10 corny kegs sinse my last refill.
Enter your email address to join: