Toilet Rocker
Well-Known Member
The Pol said:There was a nappy headed ho in the room next to mine last night gettin her skeez on, kept me up for while... awoke tired today.
![]()
I think you need to be banned from this board now.
The Pol said:There was a nappy headed ho in the room next to mine last night gettin her skeez on, kept me up for while... awoke tired today.
![]()
david_42 said:Maybe I'm just lucky, but I don't even know who he is. I suspect not having a working TV for 30 years has something to do with it.
ilikestuff said:Freedom of speech wasn't the issue here, it's money. Bottom line is that NBC and CBS don't want the bad rep for letting a sleeze keep his job, and they aren't getting anything if they do.
There is no way that advertisers were going to be picking his show for there spots, so he wasn't going to be making any money for the company. Forget about what he said, that's not the issue. Proctor and Gamble's ad agency, for example, don't want to associate with someone that has a bad rep, so they aren't going to spend money for him, his show, or even his time slot to endorse them. No revenue from ads, no reason to keep the show on air.
cha ngo said:40+ posts about Imus and not one about Kurt Vonnegut.
So it goes . . .
I know how you feel. It's almost like, well, if you fire me then I have nothing to apologize for.Chimone said:my rant of the morning....
first off, we've all had a slip of the tongue at least once in our life before. We've spoken without thinking, and had it come back to bite us in the ass.
Now Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson........notice how I purposely left out the Reverend part. Men of the lord eh? Well doesnt the lord preach forgivness, compassion, and love? See where Im going with that?
Anyways, . You can now strongarm advertising agencies to withdraw their money in order to keep themselves out of it. If a certain ad agency didnt withdraw from Imus's show, well then they would be then considered a racist company for somehow supporting the nappy headed ho comment. So now a small group of people can now have you removed from your job of almost 40 years for one stupid comment. Freedom of speech? I say not. Is being fired for that justifiable? Wouldn't a unpaid leave or some other punishment be acceptable?
This is blowing up into so much more than a stupid nappy head comment. This is now a much, much bigger issue.
NEVER APOLOGIZE FOR ANYTHING
i shall now go get some coffee, and try and reread what I just wrote to see if it makes any sense
Chimone said:Now Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson........notice how I purposely left out the Reverend part. Men of the lord eh? Well doesnt the lord preach forgivness, compassion, and love? See where Im going with that?
Chimone said:Anyways, . You can now strongarm advertising agencies to withdraw their money in order to keep themselves out of it. If a certain ad agency didnt withdraw from Imus's show, well then they would be then considered a racist company for somehow supporting the nappy headed ho comment. So now a small group of people can now have you removed from your job of almost 40 years for one stupid comment. Freedom of speech? I say not. Is being fired for that justifiable? Wouldn't a unpaid leave or some other punishment be acceptable?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
homebrewer_99 said:I know how you feel. It's almost like, well, if you fire me then I have nothing to apologize for.
Now that he's off the air it may be time to really speak his mind and use any word that's printed in the dictionary.
That's one of my peeves concerning ignorance and a general lack of education. If it's in the dictionary why is it wrong to say the word aloud? Any word??![]()
I concur. As far as I'm concerned politicians have stamped the Constitution null and void.Evan! said:Even if it's not in the dictionary, the government should not be in the business of regulating the utterances of words. It's blatantly unconstitutional, and they justify it with this tortured argument that they "own" the broadcast spectrum, therefore they can do what they want with it. It's sick.
Apples and oranges...according to the law, assault, even verbal, is not grounds for battery (hitting).Chimone said:I heard a good analogy the other day......
Ok, lets say you have the freedom to say whatever you want. Sure you can say whatever you want, but Im going to punch you in the face everytime you do. So feel free to go ahead and say it, but just get ready to get hit.
Is that really freedom of speech?
cdana said:So Sharpton demands that Imus apologize and be fired for his statements.
Chimone said:I heard a good analogy the other day......
Ok, lets say you have the freedom to say whatever you want. Sure you can say whatever you want, but Im going to punch you in the face everytime you do. So feel free to go ahead and say it, but just get ready to get hit.
Is that really freedom of speech?
cdana said:So Sharpton demands that Imus apologize and be fired for his statements.
When is Sharpton going to apologize to the Duke Lacrosse players that he pretty much tried and convicted? When is he going to apologize to the coach of the Duke Lacrosse team who resigned as a result of now unfounded rape allegations? Don't hold your breath.
cdana said:So Sharpton demands that Imus apologize and be fired for his statements.
When is Sharpton going to apologize to the Duke Lacrosse players that he pretty much tried and convicted? When is he going to apologize to the coach of the Duke Lacrosse team who resigned as a result of now unfounded rape allegations? Don't hold your breath.