I am making a SNPA clone this weekend, and at the suggestion of my LHBS, I opted to manipulate the water chemistry for this brew.
My base profile is attached:
Using the nomograph in the back of HTB, I figured on roughly 240ppm of Ca
My first plan of action was to use 26.4 grams of GYPSUM (divided correctly between mash and sparge water volumes)
This resulted in the following final amounts in the water:
Ca: 240.6
SO4: 458
HCO3: 197
Obviously, the sulfate amount got my attention as probably TOO HIGH
and the bicarb level seemed high (but it is my base water)
So, I option #2 was to use GYPSUM and CaCl to get to the amounts and that resulted in:
Ca: 238.1
SO4: 181.6
Cl: 211.4
(and of course the baseline 197 HCO3 again)
Which option is better?
(I am leaning towards #2 because it seems more balanced; SPECIFICALLY the sulfate level.)
View attachment Water1.pdf
My base profile is attached:
Using the nomograph in the back of HTB, I figured on roughly 240ppm of Ca
My first plan of action was to use 26.4 grams of GYPSUM (divided correctly between mash and sparge water volumes)
This resulted in the following final amounts in the water:
Ca: 240.6
SO4: 458
HCO3: 197
Obviously, the sulfate amount got my attention as probably TOO HIGH
and the bicarb level seemed high (but it is my base water)
So, I option #2 was to use GYPSUM and CaCl to get to the amounts and that resulted in:
Ca: 238.1
SO4: 181.6
Cl: 211.4
(and of course the baseline 197 HCO3 again)
Which option is better?
(I am leaning towards #2 because it seems more balanced; SPECIFICALLY the sulfate level.)
View attachment Water1.pdf