Converting corn starch to glucose.

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Bloodflow

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am a homebrewer from Michigan, and I am looking for a cheap alternative to buying malt extract at $4/lb. I began looking into converting cornstarch, which is made up of long chains of glucose molecules, and found a method explained here, and also below: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_is_enzymatic_conversion_of_starch_to_glucose_syrup_done?#slide=54 I would like some help turning this process into more of a recipe that can be used by others, and I have several questions. I will also include the info below, along with a breakdown of the steps as I understand them, and my questions. I appreciate any help that you can offer. Thanks in advance.

To convert this polymer into its monomer, the amylase enzyme is used. The amylase enzyme can be classified into three categories: α-amylase, β-amylase, and glucoamylase. α-amylase will break the α-1,4-glycosidic bond randomly, giving molecules of dextrins. α-amylase can also break the α-1,6-glycosidic bond, but at a much slower rate (usually the enzym pullulanase is added to accelerate the breakage of α-1,6-glycosidic bond). β-amylase breaks the α-1,4-glycosidic bond from the non-reducing end, giving molecules of maltoses. And glucoamylase breaks the α-1,4-glycosidic bond also from the non-reducing end, giving molecules of glucose (Wiseman, 1985).

The α-amylase used is obtained from the bacteria B. subtilis or B. licheniformis, whereas the β-amylase is obtained from Aspergillus sp. and Rhizopus sp.

This conversion took place in a couple of steps:

First, we make a solution from the starch. In Wiseman (1985), a 30-40% solution w/w is preferred, which will -after the conversion reaction- give a 94-97% glucose in equilibrium mixture.
Then, we gelatinized this solution. Gelatinization is the process of breaking down the intermolecular bonds if starch molecules in the presence of water and heat.
After the starch solution is gelatinized (by heating), the solution became very viscous, just like the starch (kanji) we used to stiffen our clothing items. This is where the α-amylase is added, at 90 degreesdegrees Celsius and stirred for approximately 2 hours. This is the process of liquefying the starch. See, this α-amylase will break down the α-1,4-glycosidic bond, but not the α-1,6-glycosidic bond. Therefore, the reaction yields molecules of branched but short glucose. Branched molecules are soluble in water, whereas linear ones are insoluble. In other words, the branched molecule will make a less viscous solution that the linear ones. Hence the viscosity of the starch solution will decrease as the α-amylase works (Wiseman, 1985).
Liquefying can also be done with acid (HCl), in room temperature and acidic condition (pH 4.5-5). The downside of using acid is that acid can hydrolyze protein into amino acid, which will cause the browning reaction (or the Maillard reaction: reaction between amino acid and reducing sugar which will result in the presence of flavour. www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maillard_reaction). This is of course not desirable, because in order to get a pure glucose (or high concentrated, at least), the starch has to be really rid of impurities, where as an enzymatic reaction is specific and only the starch will be converted.
After the liquefying process, saccharifying is done with glucoamylase. The temperature for this step is 55-60 degreesdegrees Celsius. Saccharifying literally meant to convert into sugar (saccharose). Or, in more scientific words, saccharifying is the process of converting a sugar derivative or complex carbohydrate into a simple soluble fermentable sugar by hydrolysis.
The conversion is assumed to be done. A sample of the sugar is to be taken repeatedly at a time interval, and analyzed. Here we use the Fehling's reagent. The Fehling's reagen consisted of Fehling A (blue, copper sulfate solution) and Fehling B (colorless, potassium hydroxide and potassium sodium tartrate solution). This reagent specifically oxidize reducing sugars (glucose is a reducing sugar), and will result in a change of color from blue to red (cuprous sulfate). A standard solution of pure glucose is used to standarized the Fehling's reagent.


After obtaining the glucose concentration at every interval of the reaction, these data is plotted according to the Michaelis-Menten kinetics.



Step 1- Make a 30%-40% solution of corn starch to water ( How does this convert?)

Step 2- Heat mixture to 90C/194F, add Alpha Amylase and keep at that temp, and stir for 2 hours. (Will this work? http://www.midwestsupplies.com/amylase-enzyme.html If so, how much do I add? If not, where can I find what I need? Do I have to stir continuously for 2 hours? Is there an acceptable temperature range if I am unable to keep it at exactly 194F?)

Step 3- Drop temp to 55-60C/131-140F and add glucoamylase. (How long do I stay at this temp? Where do I get glucoamylase? How much do I use?)



That's what I have so far.
 
You don't need to make glucose from starches manually. This is the reaction one gets by mashing base grains with crystal & other grains to make the sugary wort. It's the mash that converts starches in the grains to simple sugars that can be metabolized by brewer's yeasts we use. But it also produces long chain sugars that give the color & flavor by way of the sprouted grains being roasted to varying degrees in ovens for various colors & flavors. So your calculations are leaving out these long chain sugars that help make beer what it is.
 
If you are going to all that trouble to convert corn starch, why not just go all grain? All Grain seems to be less time consuming than what you are working on and if you buy in bulk, you can definitely get under $1/lb.

I'm all for innovation and experimentation, but in this case, if sugary wort is your goal, all-grain seems like a better option.
 
Okay, if all grain is the better option, can I mash with the True Brew equipment kit? I am not in a position right now to buy new equipment, but if it's a matter of boiling the grains, I have a 5 gallon stock pot.
 
Never boil the grains! I do partial boil,partial mash brew in a bag in my SS 5 gallon stock pot. I use a 5G nylon paint strainer bag stretched over the lip of my kettle. I usually mash 5-6lbs of grain in 2 gallons of spring water @ 153-155F for 1 hour. Sparge with 1.5 gallons 170F spring water to get 3.5 gallons boil volume in my 5G kettle. At flame out,I add the extract & stir well to mix. Then chill to 75F or so,straining into fermenter. Then top off with spring water that's chilled in the fridge a day or two before brew day. This gives a wort temp of about 65F.
 
Thank you. I misspoke, I know not to boil the grains. Thank you for outlining the process. I will try it with my next batch.
 
There is a sticky at the top of this forum for "easy partial mash brewing" . .. read that, and follow the steps, just consider that you'll be mashing ALL of your grain, not just a few lbs of it.
 
Using corn starch in brewing is nothing new. If you are set on trying it, forget about using amylase enzymes. You will need corn starch void of anti caking agents. Now, you'll need a mashtun or bag of some type. What you'll do is; for every pound of pure corn starch you will need 3 pounds of crushed 6 row. Starch gelatinizes at 149 F, so there is no reason to boil anything except the wort produced. Mix the corn starch with the malt and infuse or soak in hot water to achieve a mash temp of 153 F. Start with 1.25 qts/lb. Let the mash rest for 20 minutes and check for conversion using iodine. If conversion hasn't taken place, thin down the mash with hot water and maintain the temp and check at 30 minutes. Corn starch converts much quicker than flaked corn. The mash should convert in less than an hour. If you are a bagger, not using a filter bed, excess starch can be carried over, but don't worry, the haze from 6 row will be there too. After conversion use the same process that a bagger uses to get the volume of wort desired.

""You don't need to make glucose from starches manually. This is the reaction one gets by mashing base grains with crystal & other grains to make the sugary wort. It's the mash that converts starches in the grains to simple sugars that can be metabolized by brewer's yeasts we use. But it also produces long chain sugars that give the color & flavor by way of the sprouted grains being roasted to varying degrees in ovens for various colors & flavors. So your calculations are leaving out these long chain sugars that help make beer what it is.""

The above isn't exact. But, I know what union is getting at. Crystal and other non diastatic malt does nothing enzymatically. In a nutshell: There are really no long chain sugars. Sugars (there are many) are produced through enzymatic action, reducing carbohydrates and starch. Starch, like protein are long chains. Here's what happens. Certain enzymes are produced during the malting process. Some are destroyed by the kilning process. Starch is natures container for holding enzymes. Alpha, basically, liquifies starch and turns it into a carbohydrate stew. It also, chops up the starch at 1-4 links. Everytime it cuts the chain, a reducing end and a non reducing end are formed on the chain. Beta can only work on the non reducing end. It will lop off 2 molecules of starch/carb stew and blend with one water molecule, producing maltose. Beta also can lop off 3 molecules of starch, mixing with one water molecule producing maltriose. Maltriose is the sugar that yeast use during lagering phase. Now, what takes place; after alpha and beta can reduce the chain no farther, a-limit and b-limit dextrins are formed. Beta can chop down to a 1-6 link. Once, the enzyme gets to a branch, they're done. There are de-branching enzymes. The enzymes, dextrinase and maltase are de-branching enzymes, destroyed during kilning of modern malt. There are a limited amount left in low modified pils malt. De-branching enzymes aid alpha and beta to produce many non reducing ends. The more the non reducing ends, the more beta has to work with and faster. A decoction brewer, using under modified malt takes advantage of the enzymes during a low temp rest. It's not unusual for a tri decoction to convert in ten minutes with under modified malt...Maybe do what the other brewers suggest. Brew in a bag, using all grain. It's cheaper and easier than using adjuncts. Get a feeling for all grain before experimenting with something that you might end up pouring down the drain. However, if you do decide to experiment, it will be an excellent learning curve. If things turn crappy, keep at it, until you tune it in...Good Luck. Brew On.
 
I just added crystal,etc grains to my explanation since I put them all together in the mash. So it's the base malts that provide all the enzymatic action. As I understand it,it's the long chain sugars & such that give color & flavor,as they don't ferment out.
 
Back
Top