I hadn't updated the "batch volume" on that post #55 earlier. It doesn't make any difference (solely aesthetic, apart from changing the "hardness minerals" to match), but it's nice to have it all say the right things.
The "batch volume" (and therefore "sparge volume") remains uncorrected in post #51 because the allowed correction time has elapsed. But again, it doesn't actually alter the parts being discussed (and there are no "hardness minerals). Just be aware if trying to dig deeper in that diagram! The final result will be some very weak beer
The "batch volume" (and therefore "sparge volume") remains uncorrected in post #51 because the allowed correction time has elapsed. But again, it doesn't actually alter the parts being discussed (and there are no "hardness minerals). Just be aware if trying to dig deeper in that diagram! The final result will be some very weak beer
