Ike
nOob for life
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
- Messages
- 532
- Reaction score
- 186
OK, lots of learning going on around here the past couple days, for yours truly!
I've spent quite a bit of time wading through LOTS of theads discussing racking to secondary vs. leaving it in primary a bit longer and then going straight to bottles. I've read how it seems to be a matter of opinion. I've read about the advantages of each (clearer beer from secondary, less chance of infection if you skip racking to secondary, etc) but have a specific goal to reach, and wonder which would be better, or if there would be no difference either way.
At the moment, I'm very fermentation temperature-aware, because I have minimal control over it right now. I'm running 6.5 gal glass carboys in swamp coolers, so there's a little control (fan vs. no fan, ice in bath vs. no ice, you know the story) but it's pretty rudimentary. SO because of this, I want to do everything I can in the conditioning phases to help the yeast clean up any off flavors and fusels, just in case.
Is this better accomplished by leaving it in primary, over the cake? Or is there enough yeast activity left suspended in the beer that I can rack to secondary and still expect the flavors to improve?
For the record, current batch is a Scottish Ale kit from the LHBS, with WLP028 doing the work. BUT, I'm interested in this as a general question, rather than just WRT this particular ale or yeast.
If keeping it in primary is best, that's what I'll do. If moving to secondary will still allow the cleanup, I will do that so I can get started on that Requiem Raspberry recipe that the entire world is ranting and raving about!
THANKS!
Ike
I've spent quite a bit of time wading through LOTS of theads discussing racking to secondary vs. leaving it in primary a bit longer and then going straight to bottles. I've read how it seems to be a matter of opinion. I've read about the advantages of each (clearer beer from secondary, less chance of infection if you skip racking to secondary, etc) but have a specific goal to reach, and wonder which would be better, or if there would be no difference either way.
At the moment, I'm very fermentation temperature-aware, because I have minimal control over it right now. I'm running 6.5 gal glass carboys in swamp coolers, so there's a little control (fan vs. no fan, ice in bath vs. no ice, you know the story) but it's pretty rudimentary. SO because of this, I want to do everything I can in the conditioning phases to help the yeast clean up any off flavors and fusels, just in case.
Is this better accomplished by leaving it in primary, over the cake? Or is there enough yeast activity left suspended in the beer that I can rack to secondary and still expect the flavors to improve?
For the record, current batch is a Scottish Ale kit from the LHBS, with WLP028 doing the work. BUT, I'm interested in this as a general question, rather than just WRT this particular ale or yeast.
If keeping it in primary is best, that's what I'll do. If moving to secondary will still allow the cleanup, I will do that so I can get started on that Requiem Raspberry recipe that the entire world is ranting and raving about!
THANKS!
Ike