• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Bruery Reserve Society 2014 Allocations/Discussion Thread

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
A) How are they going to call 19.7% "drinkable"

While I tend to agree, I had the 2014 BT at the treatment tournament and based off my memory of past BT it was the easiest drinking right off the bat. I find it drier and taste more of leather and Tabaco than the usual sweetness of BT. I really enjoyed it.
 
Wineification II was released to Hoarders also:

Wineification™ II
13.7% abv
$39.99 - $31.99
Purchase Limit: 3 bottles
2 additional bottles included with membership
Hoarders Society Exclusive

In this second rendition of Wineification, the Rues and Parkers continue to vanquish the boundaries between wine and beer. Again they have combined their brains and brawn on a blend of juicy Rodney's Vineyard Petite Sirah grapes with The Bruery's imperial stout, then aged this wine/beer hybrid in French Oak barrels. The flavor profile is remarkable. Notes of black cherry, vanilla, cinnamon, oak, aged balsamic, port wine and a sherry-like oxidation from the barrels. This beer is like nothing that you have ever tried before...besides, perhaps, Wineification I.


"the Rues and Parkers continue to vanquish the boundries between wine and beer."

Really?
 
I took the original release schedule early in the year and copied it to a spreadsheet for tracking purchases. I have it listed as a July release. And I remember it being kinda fitting: 6 months away from the BT release, and an "approachable" BA stout for summer.

And they've had it available on tap in the tasting room for at least a month now. The tasting room releases are typically on-par with the bottle sales. Furthermore, they haven't really said anything about it lately. It's been quite a while since I've heard the Bruery even mention ****.

I thought about crediting Xul for his post on BA, but I changed my mind and decided to use his words as my own.

Looking at cached versions of the release projections (which they've completely given up on updating) on archive.org, The Bruery had it slated for December as far back as June.

Xul, if you read this, a 10th-grader would argue that the statement above isn't plagiarism as I clearly replaced "they" with "The Bruery," so it's now my own original thought. ;)
 
Last edited:
I thought about crediting Xul for his post on BA, but I changed my mind and decided to use his words as my own.

Xul, if you read this, a 10-grader would argue that the statement above isn't plagiarism as I clearly replaced "they" with "The Bruery," so it's now my own original thought. ;)
The 10th grader's teacher would turn around and point out that if you're going to claim it's not plagiarism, you need to cite that ****. And I don't mean just a link, I'm looking for proper MLA citation format. :p
 
I hate to pile on but you guys realize an actual Margarita is around 12-15%

If you guys want a margarita beer under 10% I've got good news for you, it's already available
The mouthfeel and flavor balance of a 15% ABV mixed drink are different from the mouthfeel and flavor balance of a 15% ABV beer. I actually think Or Xata would've been a decent candidate for a stronger base beer, while Roble Blanco seems like it would be better served as a thinner, slightly easier drinking style.
 
I thought about crediting Xul for his post on BA, but I changed my mind and decided to use his words as my own.

Looking at cached versions of the release projections (which they've completely given up on updating) on archive.org, The Bruery had it slated for December as far back as June.

Xul, if you read this, a 10-grader would argue that the statement above isn't plagiarism as I clearly replaced "they" with "The Bruery," so it's now my own original thought. ;)
You may very well be right, but I transcribed that spreadsheet in February or March. I have certainly made mistakes before, but I guess we'll just have to see. Thanks for the info though.
 
image%25255B3%25255D.png

So many sad feels about this.
 
The 10th grader's teacher would turn around and point out that if you're going to claim it's not plagiarism, you need to cite that ****. And I don't mean just a link, I'm looking for proper MLA citation format. :p

I only have experience citing Wikipedia.
 
perhaps, that based on past experience and their current trackrecord, this potentially means that **** got infected and this is what's become of it.
**** was supposed to be 11% right? This is 16%, so they would have to blend reg BT with it to get to that % I would think.

Fingers crossed it's not ****.
 
It's not ****. Blue BBLs has been slated as a hoarders release since day one.

I'm still hedging bets that **** is infected. Hopefully not, because that's been something I've been looking forward to all year.
 
"sour stout"

Not a "style" that has a high percentage of successes, IMO.

It's also not a style that many breweries even attempt. The Bruery was one of the first with Tart of Darkness. People use to go crazy over that beer until it became a regular, annual offering and lost some of its mystique. ToD is most likely one of the base beers for this which is okay by me.
 
For argument's sake, let' say the Roble Blanco is awesome and takes exactly like a margarita. Does everyone realize that a margarita may actually be cheaper ounce-for-ounce?

It does. i was pleasantly surprised as it was on draft tonight. Coffee smoking wood was also great. blueberry smoking wood and mole smoking wood were not my thing. Winification II and SitR w/ nectarines also stellar.
 
It's also not a style that many breweries even attempt. The Bruery was one of the first with Tart of Darkness. People use to go crazy over that beer until it became a regular, annual offering and lost some of its mystique. ToD is most likely one of the base beers for this which is okay by me.
In the very first mention of Blue BBLs they said it was a Black Tuesday/Tart of Darkness Blend with Blueberries.
 
"Yay Black Tuesday!....roble blanco?...wheat..15%...margarita???...tequila barrel????
Dafuq?" -me reading the email today.
There's seriosuly nothing remotely appealing to me about this beer.
 
In the very first mention of Blue BBLs they said it was a Black Tuesday/Tart of Darkness Blend with Blueberries.

I curious where you saw this. The original 2014 HS invite email (aka "very first mention" ;)) referred to Blue BBLs as a "Sour / Strong Ale Blend with Blueberries". No mention of stout, let alone specifics that it was a blend of BT and ToD.
 
I curious where you saw this. The original 2014 HS invite email (aka "very first mention" ;)) referred to Blue BBLs as a "Sour / Strong Ale Blend with Blueberries". No mention of stout, let alone specifics that it was a blend of BT and ToD.
I remember there was some discrepancy with the announcement where they amended it a couple days later and some of the descriptions words were changed (and they got rid of the hoodie), but the very first mention of someone posting a list is on page 16 of the Hoarders thread on the site "Bee Eh" and (I was slightly mistaken) it lists it as a Tart of Darkness / Black Tuesday Blend w/Blueberries instead of a Black Tuesday / Tart of Darkness Blend w/Blueberries [You actually quote that post with it listed as ToD/BT blend on page 18 :) ]

Then PMR posts:
"Edit: What Matt said. Plus, a few minor changes have been made to the info there in the past few minutes, so take another look if you've already seen it.

Cheers,
Patrick
The Bruery"

Then on Page 19 a user references in bold that the beer now is listed as Sour / Strong Ale Blend instead of what was originally posted.
 
Back
Top