Protos
Die Schwarzbier Polizei
Well, the BJCP classification has its merits and flaws. From one side, there's a total mess with English styles, from another, German styles are categorised quite well (albeit incomplete).
Difficulties with many categories arose just because many of those styles - like Saisons - were already dead or dying in their native cultures. And the Founding Fathers who created the BJCP styleguide weren't professional historians, after all, to have the full scope of foreign brewing traditions. I think it would be utterly chauvinistic to state that the urge to categorize the world is a unique American thing (it's not)
BJCP prevailed rather because the others just didn't care to codify their brewing heritage, letting it vanish. No wonder, that some modern "rebirth" projects in Europe are grounded on the flawed BJCP styleguides rather than on local traditions, that have almost vaned without leaving much knowledge behind. Luckily, the trend is changing, and more thorough and fumdamental researches in local beer history start to emerge. Patterson, Garshol, Krennmeier, Mulder, Verberg and many others. That's the future of the trade, I hope.
It's not unlike in Australia, you know, where much of what is now proudly toted as "authentic millenia-old living Aboriginal culture" is actually mere modern interpretations taken from Western ethnographic records of 1850s-1930s, because the original chain of passing traditions had been cut decades before the current surge of interest to the subject.
In one word, BJCP has got its messy parts, but without it the mess would be much worse.
Disclaimer: I am not an American but I am a historian, so could be a bit opinionated. BJCP is essentially about brewing history, and as an attempt to draw a preliminary non-scientific practical sketch of the world beer heritage I deem it high, even despite its obvious and serious flaws.
Difficulties with many categories arose just because many of those styles - like Saisons - were already dead or dying in their native cultures. And the Founding Fathers who created the BJCP styleguide weren't professional historians, after all, to have the full scope of foreign brewing traditions. I think it would be utterly chauvinistic to state that the urge to categorize the world is a unique American thing (it's not)
It's not unlike in Australia, you know, where much of what is now proudly toted as "authentic millenia-old living Aboriginal culture" is actually mere modern interpretations taken from Western ethnographic records of 1850s-1930s, because the original chain of passing traditions had been cut decades before the current surge of interest to the subject.
In one word, BJCP has got its messy parts, but without it the mess would be much worse.
Disclaimer: I am not an American but I am a historian, so could be a bit opinionated. BJCP is essentially about brewing history, and as an attempt to draw a preliminary non-scientific practical sketch of the world beer heritage I deem it high, even despite its obvious and serious flaws.