McMullan
wort maker
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2015
- Messages
- 2,566
- Reaction score
- 3,461
A case of really being 'in the sh*t'.
A case of really being 'in the sh*t'.
At least she tried herself, we had a school principal force one of his students to climb into a pit toilet to retrieve his phone, and then paid the child the equivalent of a couple of dollars.A case of really being 'in the sh*t'.
9th
I remember a class in journalism studying how to write compact, succinct headlines. And how not to. One that always stuck out in my memory was a story in a British journal about a man who had fallen into and was entombed in an outdoor pit toilet (we called them outhouses, growing up in the U.S. midwest) for quite some time before being rescued. The single column, three line headline read:
Not to argue with you Balrog but I find esp on the roads to be extremely helpful.
You're not part of the solution, are you.What are turn signals?
seems to me it should follow maritime/admiralty law...
don't see how space could be any different
They mekk'em tough up North...
Yeah. I bet there would be less cases of resisting arrest if there was a threat of a dildo being used on you !The Land of the Free is just weird. Mind you, who knows what might have happened if that's what had been used "for law enforcement purposes" on George Floyd...
https://www.chron.com/politics/texas/article/In-Texas-even-possession-of-a-sex-toy-is-11161211.php
Texas ... labels the sex toy as an "obscene device" and declares it a crime if someone "possesses six or more obscene devices"...It does make exceptions for people who have the multiples of the device for medical and law enforcement purposes...Which means you can legally own more guns than sex toys in the Lone Star State.
Damn, I've been sexually harassed for years...Talking of which, a man working at the British Bung Company went to court this week :
https://news.sky.com/story/calling-...harassment-employment-tribunal-rules-12611690
The three employment judges:Talking of which, a man working at the British Bung Company went to court this week :
https://news.sky.com/story/calling-...harassment-employment-tribunal-rules-12611690
You jest, but the tribunal was in fact bald. Meet Employment Judge Jonathan Brain, lead member of the tribunalThe three employment judges:
View attachment 768915
Clearly a conflict of interest influenced the panel's decision making. It needs to be challenged.You jest, but the tribunal was in fact bald. Meet Employment Judge Jonathan Brain, lead member of the tribunal
![]()