You're talking about something you almost have to have in this country... except for a few cities. Beer certainly is not. Comparing a necessity to a luxury item.
Beer Boycott
- Thread starter subtlephilo
- Start date
Help Support Homebrew Talk:
You're talking about something you almost have to have in this country... except for a few cities. Beer certainly is not. Comparing a necessity to a luxury item.
trailblazer
Well-Known Member
i dont ever buy bmc, but if im at a friend or family members house and they happen to offer me a coors light in a bottle, i will not say no. i dont think coors light is that bad, it taste a little like water but its nothing compared to natty ice or miluake. if i was dieing of thirst in the desert i wouldnt drink one of those.
I actually just watched Beer Wars myself. I think its screwed up how they make it so difficult for the craft brewers and micro brews to get their products in the store. Slowly they are getting their beers in though and i hope they continue to.
I don't drink BMC beers because i don't like them. For the last 2 years all i've really bought have been micro brews. I'll get some german, belgian or english beers here and there but i can get some good micro brews by me so that's what i drink a lot of. Also its hard to keep up with who owns what any more. Drink what you like and don't worry about it.
I don't drink BMC beers because i don't like them. For the last 2 years all i've really bought have been micro brews. I'll get some german, belgian or english beers here and there but i can get some good micro brews by me so that's what i drink a lot of. Also its hard to keep up with who owns what any more. Drink what you like and don't worry about it.
smackythefrog
Well-Known Member
northernlad
Well-Known Member
Yes, the ladies who are "wine drinkers" with their Beringer White Zinfandel in a 6oz wine glass at the bingo hall.
I applaud those of you gracious enough to accept a Coors Lite offered by your host. Add me to the list of ******* guests.
I don't mind the idea of Wal-Mart and it's business model. I do mind that they vacated a perfectly good building and moved across the freeway just so they could super size it. That earns an embargo from me.
Weezknight
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 333
- Reaction score
- 2
I'm in the same boat as you. I've been known to drink Pepsi during an entire Super Bowl party because the hosts only had Coors Lite and Bud. Sorry, I just can't do it anymore.
![Craft A Brew - Safale BE-256 Yeast - Fermentis - Belgian Ale Dry Yeast - For Belgian & Strong Ales - Ingredients for Home Brewing - Beer Making Supplies - [3 Pack]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51bcKEwQmWL._SL500_.jpg)
Bernie Brewer
Grouchy Old Fart
Hmm. If everyone boycotted BMC, then the micros would get too huge and you have to boycott THEM, cause they'd get too big. Just drink what you want.
SteveM
Well-Known Member
I have a Honda. I don't see the connection between beer and cars.
SkiSoloII
Splitting the beer atom since 1996
Difference is big- vs. small- ticket items. They call beer/alcohol quasi recession-proof due to the nature of cost and effect. Doesn't cost much for beer/alcohol to have the desired effect, whether that effect is tipsiness (BMC swillers) or pure enjoyment (us "purists"). Costs lots more for the autos in question for the adrenaline/aquisition/ownership high. Working for one of the domestic auto companies, I can assure you that the motor vehicle industry is not recession proof.
Dave
Ksosh
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 509
- Reaction score
- 44
Boycotts don't work.
You'd have to get the entire population of the world to boycott them to have any effect.
And I've never seen the entire population of the world agree on anything. So it won't happen.
I avoid Walmart because it's a depressing place. Anytime Ive walked into one in the past, my mood instantly drops. The people there are just so morose.
I generally also only buy used. But that's just not feasible with beer and food. Well, I suppose it is, but would you want to?
You'd have to get the entire population of the world to boycott them to have any effect.
And I've never seen the entire population of the world agree on anything. So it won't happen.
I avoid Walmart because it's a depressing place. Anytime Ive walked into one in the past, my mood instantly drops. The people there are just so morose.
I generally also only buy used. But that's just not feasible with beer and food. Well, I suppose it is, but would you want to?
I think that this whole idea is senseless.
While more than a few of us (in general) might drink a BMC product, many of us "boycott" them mostly because we just don't like the products. (Count me as one of those guys).
Fact is, even with the marketing issues, advertising, and whatever underhanded things the big three are involved in, the craft and microbrew industry continues to grow and flourish.
There will always be a place for BMC, and there is going to be a continuing and growing demand for alternatives.
Also consider than many of your craft and micro breweries have partial ownership by BMC. 25% of Redhook is owned by Anheuser-Busch, in turn RedHook owns 40% of Goose Island Brewing, and 20% of Kona Brewing. So to effectively boycott one of the big three, you'd have to give up at least three non-BMC beers. (And that's just one example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redhook_Ale_Brewery
While more than a few of us (in general) might drink a BMC product, many of us "boycott" them mostly because we just don't like the products. (Count me as one of those guys).
Fact is, even with the marketing issues, advertising, and whatever underhanded things the big three are involved in, the craft and microbrew industry continues to grow and flourish.
There will always be a place for BMC, and there is going to be a continuing and growing demand for alternatives.
Also consider than many of your craft and micro breweries have partial ownership by BMC. 25% of Redhook is owned by Anheuser-Busch, in turn RedHook owns 40% of Goose Island Brewing, and 20% of Kona Brewing. So to effectively boycott one of the big three, you'd have to give up at least three non-BMC beers. (And that's just one example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redhook_Ale_Brewery
user 30639
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2009
- Messages
- 881
- Reaction score
- 66
Some of you must be able to see for miles from up on your high horse.
I have nothing against big companies. I have nothing against BMC companies either. I just don't like the beers that made them big. I do drink off brand beers that they own like bass ale. So I don't boycott the companies, I just boycott the products I don't like. It also frustrates me they have all the equipment and capital to brew great beer, yet they don't. The american adjunct mash is actually a pretty complicated mash schedule. They've obviously poured a lot of money into perfecting this complex scheme yet they produce really boring beer at the end. Why not expand a bit and experiment. For example, Unibroue started out making the typical macro lager with the "U" and "U2". But then they started also producing some very fine belgian style ales which have received very high praises on the international scene. Why don't the BMC companies use a little of their capital to try something similar? They are trying a little bit. AB started brewing their American Ale and Coors has their blue moon brand. But they could do a lot better. Again, I don't have anything against BMC. I have something against them producing only mediocre beer.
Difference is big- vs. small- ticket items. They call beer/alcohol quasi recession-proof due to the nature of cost and effect. Doesn't cost much for beer/alcohol to have the desired effect, whether that effect is tipsiness (BMC swillers) or pure enjoyment (us "purists"). Costs lots more for the autos in question for the adrenaline/aquisition/ownership high. Working for one of the domestic auto companies, I can assure you that the motor vehicle industry is not recession proof.
Dave
I was just playing devil's advocate with my post, so I'll continue to. So it's OK to buy from a large company that has a psuedo-monopoly if they are selling big ticket item, when there are better options that just cost more.
All I'm saying is that while we don't have to buy the beers that we don't like, there is no need for a boycott or even the discussion about it
northernlad
Well-Known Member
SteveM
Well-Known Member
No question. I'm not actively boycotting GM or Toyota, but I have not bought cars from either of them in years because they didn't meet my needs or taste.
Edit - the Superbowl would be a lot less fun if BMC didn't put those great commercials on. I have nothing particular against them, I just prefer other products. If this provokes them into attempting an American Ale or a Belgian Wit, that's not a bad thing.
jkarp
Well-Known Member
While the movie showed some dirty tricks by BMC, especially with shelf space, the fact is, there's over 1,500 breweries in the U.S. now, the highest total in 100 years. Something's working right...
SteveM
Well-Known Member
I didn't see the movie (yet), so this might have been covered in it. Back in the 50s and 60s, the Big Three, especially AB, were buying up local breweries and just shutting them down as a means of eliminating competition. Somehow, they didn't get to all of them - Yeungling was privately owned and didn't sell. I always thought that the presence of Yeungling in the Philly market led to the folks here being pretty open-minded about good alternatives to BMC.
dummkauf
Well-Known Member
umm...no offense but I don't think this board is the best place to start a boycott of the major brewers. I'm guessing that less than 1% of the members of this board drink their stuff anyway, so starting a boycott here wouldn't have much of an impact. Also, while I would agree with you that the major producers beer tastes like ****, the majority of the population disagrees with you, which is why budweiser and miller all outsell the micro brews. People spend their money on what they like, and large corporations invest their money in what sells, if the majority of the population wanted better beer, they would be producing it, but the reality is most people who drink beer simply want a cheap beer that will give them a buzz and reduced calories to "try" to keep that beer gut in check.
Hate to be a buzz kill, but that's the way I see it, though I've already been boycotting the big commercial breweries for years if it makes you feel any better.....I spend my money on what I prefer, just like the rest of the country
Hate to be a buzz kill, but that's the way I see it, though I've already been boycotting the big commercial breweries for years if it makes you feel any better.....I spend my money on what I prefer, just like the rest of the country
northernlad
Well-Known Member
Many people in this country don't spend their money on what they like, they spend it on what they are TOLD to like. Music, Food, Beer. The other factor is money. People are programmed to buy what is cheap, ie Walmart, and things made in China.
If this were not the case, McDonald's, Nickelback and BMC would not exist.
If this were not the case, McDonald's, Nickelback and BMC would not exist.
dummkauf
Well-Known Member
You are referring to being "brain washed", and while that is possible, that is an issue that won't be solved by a boycott.
As far as buying "cheap" things from walmart, or dining at McDonalds, that isn't necessarily because they are "told" to do so. The vast majority of people shop at Walmart simply because Walmart is cheap and that's all they can afford, or they are just cheap and looking to save a $0.01 where ever they can.
If you can't think for yourself, you have bigger problems in your life than drinking crappy beer.
As far as buying "cheap" things from walmart, or dining at McDonalds, that isn't necessarily because they are "told" to do so. The vast majority of people shop at Walmart simply because Walmart is cheap and that's all they can afford, or they are just cheap and looking to save a $0.01 where ever they can.
If you can't think for yourself, you have bigger problems in your life than drinking crappy beer.
northernlad
Well-Known Member
I'm sayin'
ArtVandelay
Well-Known Member
I'll drink a Miller lite now and then and mostly just when tail-gating for baseball games. It isn't good, but its drink-able, it comes in easily tranportable cans and everybody else is drinking it and I don't have too look like a pretentious tool that lets everyone know I'm too good to drink common folk brew. Plus it tastes like water and I've always heard its important to stay hydrated. They haven't hurt me, have been a big part of the city I live in for years and haven't prevented me from finding any of the micros I want at the liquor store.
However, I have to say, just as I was typing that an ad for Bud light 55 came on. That is just getting riddiculous. Maybe if the future of BMC is -40 calorie beers I might have to rethink what I'm saying.
edit: I should also say I won't touch anything Budweiser related since its sacrilegious here
However, I have to say, just as I was typing that an ad for Bud light 55 came on. That is just getting riddiculous. Maybe if the future of BMC is -40 calorie beers I might have to rethink what I'm saying.
edit: I should also say I won't touch anything Budweiser related since its sacrilegious here
Atvar
Well-Known Member
A boycott is pretty simple for me since I can buy yuengling as cheap or cheaper than BMC crap. The best way to put a hurt on BMC, though, is to introduce others to real beer. With such a huge market share, there are tons of future beer geeks out there just waiting to be shown the light.
I just hope the trend continues and by the time I die, the top 3 make up 50% or less of the market, with a ton of micro and regional breweries taking up the vacuum.
I just hope the trend continues and by the time I die, the top 3 make up 50% or less of the market, with a ton of micro and regional breweries taking up the vacuum.
OP
OP
subtlephilo
Active Member
Bud released an American Ale last year. It's not bad, but not great. Drinkable.
Not sure why this makes any difference at all. First, they are not "American Companies" in the sense that their parents are not U.S. incorporated businesses (however I suspect the vast majority of shareholders of all three ARE Americans -mutual funds, pension funds, etc...) but not sure why it matters who "owns a company" that is producing a product on American soil if that is what you are concerned about. Second, if BMC were forced to close their plants because of a massive upsurge in local craft breweries, I guarantee that these small breweries would create vastly more jobs, in local markets in the United States that probably paid a liveable wage and were much better to work for.
Not sure this helps your argument here either. If you are concerned about American jobs being lost at massive, highly automated BMC plants, then I would think you would be even more concerned about Wal-Mart, a significantly larger employer in the U.S.
I think a better argument might be to support small local breweries (or any business for that matter) that create quality products that you enjoy and are willing to pay a higher amount for knowing that they will 1) probably not use the revenue to dominate their line of business in a highly dubious manner and force others out of business for the sake of their own gain 2) probably be more inclined to source jobs & materials from the local economy as well and 3) not funnel their profits to large shareholders out of the country.
Synovia
Well-Known Member
Ksosh
Well-Known Member
Really? I thought the BMC commercials this year were boring as hell
Edcculus
Well-Known Member
I don't think a boycott will really solve anything. Those guys are allowed to make the beer they want to make. There is obviously a market for it. A massively under informed market, but a market nonetheless. I rarely buy BMC, just because I don't really like the beer. I buy what I like, and thats enough for me. If local grocery stores and beer stores continue to have good selections, I'm happy.
