homebrewdude76
Well-Known Member
For 10+ years I used various converted coolers with DIY manifolds.
Some were screens and others drilled PVC.
I did mostly batch sparge and had a generic efficiency of 72%
A little lower on the bigger beers.
I now have a Stout Tank 20gal mash tun with the Stout perforated screen.
I constant recirculate through a RIMS tube.
I am trying to fly sparge, but I think it is going too quick to call it that.
I am around 65% efficiency. Sometimes less.
I figured I would be better due to the full mash screen and the constant circulation. I do have much clearer wort going into the kettle.
Could the 1gal of worst under the screen and additional wort for RIMS throw me off? I have to increase the water/grain ratio due to this.
A quick fly sparge cause an issue? I might go back to batch sparging.
Last brew I measured mash pH and I was on target.
Any other suggestions?
Some were screens and others drilled PVC.
I did mostly batch sparge and had a generic efficiency of 72%
A little lower on the bigger beers.
I now have a Stout Tank 20gal mash tun with the Stout perforated screen.
I constant recirculate through a RIMS tube.
I am trying to fly sparge, but I think it is going too quick to call it that.
I am around 65% efficiency. Sometimes less.
I figured I would be better due to the full mash screen and the constant circulation. I do have much clearer wort going into the kettle.
Could the 1gal of worst under the screen and additional wort for RIMS throw me off? I have to increase the water/grain ratio due to this.
A quick fly sparge cause an issue? I might go back to batch sparging.
Last brew I measured mash pH and I was on target.
Any other suggestions?