Is the "dreaded FG 1.020" with extract a thing of the past?
It might be. I don't use enough extract anymore to know for sure. In years past, I *know* that extracts from different manufacturers differed in their fermentability. It wasn't an error in the ways you postulated, but it was perhaps a recipe design error where we really *needed* to sub some extract with simple sugar, but chose not to. And it's possible that since those days (I'm thinking 15+ years ago), manufacturers have stepped up their game and made most or all of their extracts more fermentable. But I remember when extracts did in fact often stick at 1.018-1.020 no matter what you did. Yeah it's probably less of an issue today than it used to be. But, don't be surprised, if every beer from your favorite extract source comes out in that range every time... the solution would simply be to try a different manufacturer next time... and to replace some extract with simple sugar that is 100% fermentable (I'd just use a pound of white table sugar).
Yeast choice is also a big factor, which applies not just to extract brewing, but for any recipe. If you want high attenuation, you should select an appropriate yeast. I remember the days where many kits contained "Edme ale yeast" or "Munton's ale yeast", which are both known today to have been notoriously poor attenuators same or similar to today's Windsor. So, yeast selection does matter and does require a little bit of research and/or experience. After all, this is a craft, for many of us at least.
Last edited: