7.99 a six pack.
Picked up some Jai Alai and Florida Cracker this weekend!
What I'd like to see is some industry group offer a 'Certified Craft' designation/logo that independent breweries can apply, and be approved, for which would guarantee a certain quality level as well as a level of independence. Breweries with the designation could use the logo on their packaging etc. which might help consumers make more informed choices.
So sounds like the BA was already on the case...
https://www.brewbound.com/news/2017...il&utm_term=0_6026cb3473-1def090572-168625296
So if InBev buys 24.9% of a company, they'll still be considered "independent."
I wonder why they chose "less than 25%" as the standard?
If I understand correctly, the criteria for this are pretty much what they've been using for the definition of 'craft' in the past; the barrel limit being an obvious hilarity! At least this is something though... anything that provides more information to the consumer as to what's truly independent and what's now 'crafty' BMC-owned can't be all bad.
Has this affected foot traffic at the Asheville stores get?
We can only hope for better distribution out of this whole thing.
Honestly, does this really bother all of you? Who cares?
If AB offered you $1 billion dollars for your brewery you wouldn't take it, because it would mean your "selling out!" Get real...
Why do so many seem to relate to the perspective of the brewery that sold out instead of the customer that they almost certainly are?
I can't relate to the perspective of the brewery, but I can say that if the price is right I'd sell too...You mean I can retire, and do what I love for fun now!? Easy choice!
From a customer's perspective, this only effects me in a positive way as my local Kroger might start stocking WW when distribution grows thanks to AB. I like good beer, regardless whose name is on it...
Plenty of other amazing breweries out there.
Just makes room for one of our HBT brothers and sisters to surpass them...
That's just the thing: it doesn't. In fact, it makes it more difficult for new breweries to break into the market. Every brand that ABI acquires is more power they have to control shelf- and tap-space, and to drive down the market price of "craft" beer. Those factors make life much more difficult for start-up breweries.
The issue isn't really about what's good for the brewery or for the consumer. It's about what's good for the craft beer movement as a whole. Budweiser already clawed their way to the top of a heap of conquered breweries once. It is fairly obvious that they are waging the same war again.
If AB starts buying all the major malt, hop, or yeast companies only to raise the prices then I will get worried about the "craft beer movement."
They buy up distributors and they pay distributors to drop craft beer, and they do many other anti-community actions.
It's at the fuzzy edge of the line - there's things they can't do regarding competition, but they go right to the line and occasionally a toe over it.
they do many other anti-community actions.
We can only hope for better distribution out of this whole thing.
Honestly, does this really bother all of you? Who cares?
If AB offered you $1 billion dollars for your brewery you wouldn't take it, because it would mean your "selling out!" Get real...
Agreed - and I'm not faulting them for doing this, just some of their methods.Like any other big corporation that is trying to get as close to a monopoly as legally possible.
Agreed as well. And I do feel bad for most of the employees, the guy who cleans out the mash tun, sets up the bottler, etc. They don't have much say in what happens with their company (neither does any other industry) but I wonder how many of them don't care who signs their paycheck, versus those who got into it with pride of working for a craft brewer, a small neighborhood company and all of a sudden they're working for the biggest beer conglomerate in the world, who is bent of squeezing the small guys off the shelves and taps of every place possible.Either way, I don't think we're going to stop InBev by boycotting their craft beer lines. It only hurts the actual craft brewery and the people that work there. I believe WW and the others retained most of their operational staff after merging with AB, but I could be wrong.
Agreed also. I bet ABInbev makes more profit off Bud Light in a day versus what they are making in a year off the dozen craft brewers they've bought in the past 10years. But it's not just the profit that drives them, it's also getting their name out as far as it can go, not that anyone in the industrialized world hasn't heard of Budweiser.AB makes enough off of their traditional stuff to do what they want anyways. Way more Bud-heavy drinkers than craft beer drinkers...Hell, I take a case with me down the river!
I would take the $1 billion, but not be hypocritical and dishonest by trying to contend that my brewery was still "craft" or obscuring the true ownership.
Providing jobs is hardly anti-community....
That in no way makes all their anti-competitve illegal practices acceptable.
Illegal? What laws are they breaking?
I've yet to see any anti-competitve practices?
Do some research. Busted in CA for pay-to-play. Busted in WA for pay-to-play.
http://goodbeerhunting.com/sightlin...es-anheuser-busch-wholesalers-for-pay-to-play
Paying "indepenent" distributors to drop craft beer is anti-competitve. Buying "independent" distributors is anti-competitive. Lobbing for laws that make things difficult for small brewers is anti-competitive.
Watch Beer Wars sometime. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1326194/