I bottle and don't want to keg. I've thought about it, but then I always wonder something:
Let's say I took the time and money to build myself a respectable keezer, furnished it with kegs, CO2 tank, parts, hoses, etc. Then over time, there's an ongoing cost for electricity, CO2 refills and small repairs like O-rings and such. Also, there's time spent maintaining the system - checking pressure, troubleshooting and repairing small problems, cleaning - 2 minutes here, 10 minutes there - it adds up.
If I just continued bottling, it would remain low cost but the whole bottling process does eat up lots of time. Maybe once in a while some will explode and I'll lose beer, but I've been pretty good at it overall. But I do need those caps...
What I want to know is: Wouldn't the money and time investment from the kegging scenario equal the low cost/extra time investment in the bottling scenario?
I know transferring beer from a fermenter to a keg is crazy simple, but I think the bottling vs. kegging argument is just six of one, half a dozen of the other.
They've got to balance each other out. Someone needs to make a graph. This is the internet, guys. Let's get down to brass tacks.