jeffmeh
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2009
- Messages
- 2,145
- Reaction score
- 216
LOL...at first I read it as Porking the Hornet's nest.....I've heard of kinky but....
Getting a few more good ones in before the day, I see.
LOL...at first I read it as Porking the Hornet's nest.....I've heard of kinky but....
Getting a few more good ones in before the day, I see.
mafeeker said:Brewing competitions are not recipe competitions. They should judge technique. There is a huge difference between having a good recipe and brewing a good beer. I see nothing wrong with submitting a clone, though I would expect you give credit to the original brewer.
cklages said:Personally I think that it would all come down to what exactly you need to get out of the competition. You have to ask the age old question that can be so hard to answer 'what do you want?'.
If you want to know if your process can produce a beer that those with somewhat refined palates deem really good, than why try to re-invent the wheel recipe wise?
If you know your process is great, but want to know if you can formulate a recipe that pushes the limits of a style in a way that impresses judges, why brew a clone?
If you want an award to hang on a wall that has no other intrinsic value, why not just print one up on the old bubble jet and buy a frame?
Considering that you don't exactly see homebrew competitions with $100,000 grand prizes, it seems that the first question one must ask before entering is 'what exactly am I trying to get out of this'. Once you have answered that question, I imagine that your course of action would be laid bare in front of you.
I personally am still trying to make a beer that really impresses SWMBO. The reason I don't steam the labels off of some Bud light is, that's not what I want.
Because you make A change the recipe is yours now?
Because you make A change the recipe is yours now?
Considering there are generally only four ingredients, a single change impacts 25% of those ingredients, no? What do you think the threshold should be, 50%?
So, all you brew are SMaSH beers with one hop addition?Considering there are generally only four ingredients, a single change impacts 25% of those ingredients, no? What do you think the threshold should be, 50%?
So, all you brew are SMaSH beers with one hop addition?
cklages said::cross: so I try to be a smart alec once and get called on it
I don't know how "but want to know if you can formulate a recipe that pushes the limits of a style in a way that impresses judges, why brew a clone" got turned into making a small tweak to someone else's recipe and calling it your own.
I still do believe that some innovation is going on, even inside relatively narrowly defined BJCP styles, and I appreciate those who are doing it. I know it isn't me doing it, in fact I spend more time riding coat tails than anything in this hobby.
My point was, there is nothing wrong with submitting a direct clone if thats what gets you where you need to go, there is also something to be said for striking out in a new direction, even if its only new to you.
Of course, you don't want to get too serious, its just beer right? *ducks*
The only objection would be the hit to his ego if you beat the author in a head to head contest using his recipe.Under that moral clause, would it also be objectionable to enter a recipe posted by a fellow HBT user?
I think most here would be honored to have their work showcased.
To me, that shows I have good brewing skills today - maybe tomorrow I'll have great recipe skills...
My local homebrew club is having 'clone competition' where you turn in your beer and the commercial beer you were trying to clone. Not BJCP-based judging but purely 'how close did you get to the real thing?'
My local homebrew club is having 'clone competition' where you turn in your beer and the commercial beer you were trying to clone. Not BJCP-based judging but purely 'how close did you get to the real thing?'
Enter your email address to join: