My very first batch of beer was 29 gallons - we had access to a really bad ass propane burner (named "the general"). Unfortunately we didn't have access to a decent mash tun, grain mill, or plate chiller. It was a nightmare and the corresponding 300 bottles (that's right, we bottled it) reflected the problems, problems also reflected on my roommates chest where he was seriously burned when tube connecting the two immersion chillers came loose and became an antipersonnel weapon. I digress but I support amateurs brewing large batches because you run into a lot of problems that you have to overcome in order to save the huge investment- very rich learning environment.
1- why risk one large fermentation instead of multiples? No more work really and you can cold crash buckets in the fridge.
2- why filter? Clarity can be achieved with fining (but then again who cares about clarity?), microbes won't be a concern really in kegged beer.
3- if this is a cheap way to make booze for underage kids, "wine" is easier.
4- filtration needs to accomplish a purpose, filtering to filter achieves nothing. I have filtered a lot of wine using the corny system, never beer. Filtration usually requires multiple pore sizes done in sequence. The first pass has to be pretty coarse and has almost no effect on clarity and no effect on microbes. Average pore size of at least 300 um to start, probably 700. Then another pass at 150-200 for polishing which would clarify. It would take another two steps at 100 and 50 um to filter out yeast and bacteria would still make it through- not to mention the fact that this is all time wasted unless you are extremely thorough in sanitizing your equipment. Furthermore, I'm not sure but chill haze may not filter out unless the beer is cold filtered. I know heat liable proteins in wine can't be filtered out. Farthestmore, the filter housing and cartridges/pads would cost money that could otherwise be used for lawyers and medical expenses.