WTF is the other explanation?
you provide it
The beer is Pliney and the guy is Plinny
While I recognize modern pronunciation, historically, the modern is incorrect. Here's some history of pliny the younger; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCvXzXJC_tI
Yes, historically the modern is incorrect. But unless we reject that language is allowed to change over time, the historical pronunciation is for the most part irrelevant. Also I'm familiar with Pliny the Younger.
Do people seriously worry about this? I can imagine some neurotic sitting at the bar in Santa Rosa shaking nervously as they come to the decision of which way to pronounce it when the bar tender asks them for their order. I know it's supposed to be pronounced P-lynn-y because I've heard people have this discussion before. I still pronounce it P-line-y because that's what my brain goes to first. Just like I know Weyermann is pronounced with a V and not a W but everyone I know, including my LHBS, still pronounces it with a W. Sometimes you just have to just say F-it and drink the beer.
I hate going into a bar or liquor and ask for "P-Lynn-y" and they reply "Oh you mean P-line-y"
So I worry about this.
Historical accuracy versus modern intent are different stories.
The same way that DC Brau is pronounced "DC Brow" when in correct German (with umlaut) it would be "DC Broy".
I learned to stop correcting "joo-lee-us see-ser" a long time ago (yool-ee-us kai-sar is more accurate to Latin pronunciation). Point being that people are going to pronounce it however they're going to pronounce it, and the modern usage, even if historically incorrect, is just as valid unless we refuse to admit that language changes over time (which anyone can see that it does).
So I always hear it pronounced "Ply-knee" and that's what I'm going with.
This. Historically accurate or not, the brewery pronounces it in the commonly pronounced way, ie Pli-KNEE
Case in point. From the brewery:View attachment 294393
We can't use the language changes argument to allow the mispronunciations of names or words. If we all went around reading and pronouncing things however we like no one would understand each other. Where does it end?
IMO we should allow language to change from region to region or when ones native tongue struggles- that can be impossible to control. Before hand, we should criticize the change, debate it and not allow it just to suit our laziness or complacencies.
Btw I don't care how it's pronounced just stating my ideas on the topic. Most people don't care but we're either on the same page or were not.
We can't use the language changes argument to allow the mispronunciations of names or words. If we all went around reading and pronouncing things however we like no one would understand each other. Where does it end?
IMO we should allow language to change from region to region or when ones native tongue struggles- that can be impossible to control. Before hand, we should criticize the change, debate it and not allow it just to suit our laziness or complacencies.
Btw I don't care how it's pronounced just stating my ideas on the topic. Most people don't care but we're either on the same page or were not.
If we all went around reading and pronouncing things however we like no one would understand each other. Where does it end?
Well, languages happen. We'll live through it I'm sure.
That's pronounced "Tinny". Vinny Cilurzo told me so.
what I am curious about is how this thread made it to 4 pages?????