I didn't recirculate the water back to the cooler. I started it off with ice water from the beginning. It took about 9 gallons of water and two bags of ice to go from 212 to 64 degrees. I didn't see where it would be helpful to recirculate and heat your ice water back up. The extra ice would cost me more than a few gallons of water from the water hose. I know it was 9 gallons because I ran the water off in a 5 gallon bucket.
Also I don't see the point in starting with the water hose. It takes my hose around 25 minutes to get my water to 100 degrees. With just ice water I went from 212 to 65 in about 15 mins. Just seems like you would use more water starting with a hose. I also want my wort chilled as fast as possible.
Am I missing something?
Missing? No, different way of getting there yes.
With just hose water, chiller and pre chiller in ice water I get to sub 70 in under 20 min.
Personally Im trying to improve on that, what worked for me was what I described above.
I may try your way as well.... if I can improve on your lower temps (id like to see 60deg) with your method,,, Im all for it.
The purpose in my mind in recirculating the water to the ice water bath is it serves to "stir" the ice bath water...moving colder water though the heated thermal layer that forms right around the prechiller coil.
I get consistently colder chiller water temps by stiring the ice water in the prechiller cooler. I get those same cooler temps by using the recirculated water coming back into the cooler to "stir" the ice water around the prechiller.
For folks not using a prechiller coil.. then, I agree, no need to dump it back in to the ice bath. Perhaps I'll try that next weekend and monitor the temps to see what works best....(colder = best for me.. I don't care about ice usage I make my own, it costs penny's for pounds in water and energy)