First of all, whomever asked if Sharona was me... well you made me laugh audibly. Nicely done.
Secondly, to those good folks who lament the wind turbines because they are ugly, well... fornicate with a fruit basket. I always like to have a well-worded scientific argument to present.
Thirdly, full disclosure, my father-in-law is a retired lubricants salesman (no, not those... NO I cant get you a discount... geez) and my sister-in-law got a solar start-up off the ground. I have just a touch of anecdotal and working knowledge of traditional and alternative energy sources. To respectfully disagree with those who claim that "green" is a misnomer... I would counter that, unfortunately, people on both sides of the energy aisle have overused the term so much that it has lost its original meaning. "Green" originally meant "sustainable," and "producing less emissions than its fossil fuel counterparts." If every turbine in America and abroad required the ritual sacrifice of a virgin during the new moon and required a lubricant made of dead baby seal heads to function... well... they would still be "green" under the original definition.
I really do think we should avoid killing bats and golden eagles though... so turbines 2.0 should take that into account.