Copper vs. SS Wort Chiller - Home Brew Forums
Register Now For Free!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Copper vs. SS Wort Chiller

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-05-2011, 11:58 AM   #1
BostonJ
Recipes 
 
Oct 2010
Houston, TX
Posts: 61
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts



Which is better? Adv? DisAdv.? Thanks

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 12:40 PM   #2
djfriesen
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Posts: 1,189
Liked 26 Times on 24 Posts


Thermally, they are about the same. With copper prices going up, they are about the same price, too. SS won't tarnish and looks sharper, IMO, so it gets my vote right now. I'm looking to step up to 5 gal AG, so I'll be in the market soon as well.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 12:51 PM   #3
solbes
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
Ramsey & Akeley, Mn
Posts: 2,975
Liked 237 Times on 217 Posts


I disagree. Thermal heat transfer coefficient K, given in watts / (meter * deg C):

Copper: 401
Stainless Steel: 16
Aluminum: 250

I can't see Stainless Steel pulling heat out as quickly as Copper. You would need a longer length of stainless to get similar performance. Yes it won't tarnish, but properly cleaned copper should last brewers a lifetime.

You can see that Aluminum conducts heat much better than Stainless as well. Makes me feel a little better about my cheap turkey fryer pot.
__________________
Primary #1: Umlaut my Kölsch VII #2: Empty
Secondary #1
: Empty #2: Empty #3: Cab MerMarqeNac Wine
Kegged
: Mugged a Monk Paters
Bottles
: Dark Belgian Strong, Black Raspberry Rhubarb wine, RIS, Carmel Apple Cider, Big 50 Barleywine, Framboise Lambic, Barolo Wine, Berry Rhubarb Wine, Black Currant wine
On Deck: BGSA

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 01:01 PM   #4
SilverZero
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Bend, OR
Posts: 942
Liked 85 Times on 65 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by solbes View Post
I disagree. Thermal heat transfer coefficient K, given in watts / (meter * deg C):

Copper: 401
Stainless Steel: 16
Aluminum: 250

I can't see Stainless Steel pulling heat out as quickly as Copper. You would need a longer length of stainless to get similar performance. Yes it won't tarnish, but properly cleaned copper should last brewers a lifetime.

You can see that Aluminum conducts heat much better than Stainless as well. Makes me feel a little better about my cheap turkey fryer pot.
+1. From a physics standpoint, SS is a silly idea compared to copper. That's why decent cookware has a copper core or base. Unless you're brewing for a reality show or something, who's going to see your shiny SS chiller anyway?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 01:12 PM   #5
djfriesen
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Posts: 1,189
Liked 26 Times on 24 Posts


Correct. I apologize. I found some bad numbers.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 01:14 PM   #6
Elweydoloco
Recipes 
 
Jul 2011
San Antonio, TX
Posts: 141
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts


There are tons of make your own wort chiller posts out there too. Regular style, Rib cage style, and others with double coils. I'd check them out and make one. If you brew chances are you're not incompetent and can get it done.
__________________
Primary
AHS London Porter
Secondary
Bottled
AHS Blue Moon Clone, Double Choco Stout, Porter, Hard Apple Cider, Apocalypso

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 05:11 PM   #7
KeydetBrewer
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
KeydetBrewer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Aug 2010
Centreville, Virginia
Posts: 43


It's true that copper has a much higher thermal heat transfer coefficient than SS. However that coefficient is just one piece of the equation that determines how well/quickly heat is transferred. One other very important factor is the thickness of the metal. Obviously a very thin piece of SS is going to transfer heat much better than a thick block of copper even though copper has a higher heat transfer coefficient. My point is don't base you opinion solely on the heat transfer coefficient. SS is a more durable metal than copper and therefore SS chillers are able to have thinner walls than the copper chillers. While the copper chiller may cool your wort a minute or two faster (if even that much) than the SS chiller, there are a lot of advantages of SS over copper. FYI, most plate chillers have use a very thin SS plate inside of them due to the advantages of SS over copper.

Bottom line: get a chiller that you can afford, that you are comfortable putting into your wort and that you are comfortable with the amount of time/effort to keep it clean

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 12:47 AM   #8
steppenwolph
Recipes 
 
Oct 2010
phila, pa
Posts: 78
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


I have a 50' stainless steel immersion chiller from nybrewsupply off of ebay. I love it. No tarnish to contaminate my wort, or, god forbid, 'polishing the coil' The thin walled nature of the tubing makes the discussion of thermal coefficients somewhat misleading. The is no way that a copper IC is 25.0625 times faster (401/16) at chilling my wort than the stainless steel IC. Copper is not even close to being twice as fast. It may be marginally faster, but the advantages of stainless (durability, lack of corrosion, and, for me, the beauty of stainless!) far out way that one aspect. Especially since I reuse my cooling water for other purposes like equipment cleaning and laundry. You can go either way, but for me, especially with prices the way they are, stainless gets my vote.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 12:52 AM   #9
cram
Recipes 
 
Jun 2011
Poway, CA
Posts: 344
Liked 41 Times on 32 Posts


+1 on the 50 foot SS from NYbrew supply. Good price for a good product.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 01:23 AM   #10
Rev2010
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
Rev2010's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
Bayonne, NJ
Posts: 2,690
Liked 335 Times on 239 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by steppenwolph View Post
No tarnish to contaminate my wort, or, god forbid, 'polishing the coil'
I don't have any experience to debate the copper vs. SS argument so I'm not commenting on that. However, I've read of this Copper immersion chiller coming out new and shiny looking thing a few times. I've only used my copper IC three times so far with great success but I've never yet pulled it out and had it looking any newer and cleaner than it went in.

If anyone can explain how/when this happens please I'd appreciate it. So far I am loving my copper IC and I know tons of homebrewers use them all over the world so I don't know how this is a major issue. Not saying it isn't, but I'd like to know how this happens. Maybe mine is just too new or I'm just doing the right thing by cleaning it right after use and StarSan sanitizing it right before use?


Rev.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wash copper wort chiller before first use? nigel31 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 12 11-19-2013 02:34 PM
SS vs. Copper Wort Chiller gcdowd Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 5 09-12-2011 10:49 PM
Wort chiller copper tubing size. jonbomb Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 5 09-23-2010 08:38 PM
Copper Wort Chiller snipper_cr Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 09-10-2009 08:31 PM
converting outdoor wort chiller to indoor wort chiller Pauliwankenobi Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 12-30-2008 11:37 AM


Forum Jump