Tell me if this is stupid and pointless. And if it's not, give me suggestions to improve this before I PM a mod.
Methods for transferring wort from the kettle into the fermenter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Method 1 -- Pour it all in
Pros:
- Simplest by far
- No added equipment, other than a funnel if you are using a carboy
- Many people claim excellent results
- Getting all of the cold break material should in theory improve head retention
Cons:
- Results in maximum trub, which can mean wasted beer
- May take longer to clear
- Some people claim grassy flavors from the used hops sitting in the trub (IIRC? Am I right about this?)
- Whole hops floating in the kraeusen just look really nasty
Method 2 -- Decant the wort, leaving as much of the hops and break material behind as possible
Pros:
- No added equipment (except maybe the funnel)
- If done right, virtually no whole hops and not much break material gets into the fermenter, resulting in less trub
- No risk of clogs
Cons:
- Pellet hops can still get in the fermenter
- It's easy to leave too much wort in the kettle, resulting in lower yield (or lower OG if you top off to the original recipe volume)
- If not done right, can easily become Method #1 unintentionally
Method 3 - Pour through a strainer or sieve of some kind
Pros:
- Keeps 100% of the hops and other solids out (less trub)
- Keeps the bulk of the break material out, especially if it is also getting filtered through whole hops (also less trub)
Cons:
- Clogs easily, especially if using pellet hops
- Extra equipment that you may not need for any other purpose
Method 4 - Rack into the fermenter using a siphon
Pros:
- If done right, keeps out 100% of whole hops, and the majority of pellet hops and break material
- If you are a homebrewer then you already have a siphon for racking anyway
- If you want to suck up some cold break material for head retention, you have perfect control over that
- Revvy says he is able to perch the auto-siphon on the 2nd-to-last rung of the wort chiller and thereby avoid all the trub, hassle-free
Cons:
- You have to sanitize your siphon (and any related equipment)
- Can become clogged if you aren't careful
Method 5 - Drain through kettle spigot
Pros:
- No whole hops can make it through
- Very little break material and other sludge makes it through, especially if you whirlpool or use a screen
- Very easy, since it does not require lifting and pouring a several gallon brew kettle, or starting a siphon
Cons:
- You need to have a kettle spigot, which may not be an option for some people
I've done each of the first three, and having not been happy with any of them, I'll be doing the siphon on my next batch. So I may not have the pros and cons right for that method. In any case, any comments? Worth it for the pro/con sticky?
Methods for transferring wort from the kettle into the fermenter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Method 1 -- Pour it all in
Pros:
- Simplest by far
- No added equipment, other than a funnel if you are using a carboy
- Many people claim excellent results
- Getting all of the cold break material should in theory improve head retention
Cons:
- Results in maximum trub, which can mean wasted beer
- May take longer to clear
- Some people claim grassy flavors from the used hops sitting in the trub (IIRC? Am I right about this?)
- Whole hops floating in the kraeusen just look really nasty
Method 2 -- Decant the wort, leaving as much of the hops and break material behind as possible
Pros:
- No added equipment (except maybe the funnel)
- If done right, virtually no whole hops and not much break material gets into the fermenter, resulting in less trub
- No risk of clogs
Cons:
- Pellet hops can still get in the fermenter
- It's easy to leave too much wort in the kettle, resulting in lower yield (or lower OG if you top off to the original recipe volume)
- If not done right, can easily become Method #1 unintentionally
Method 3 - Pour through a strainer or sieve of some kind
Pros:
- Keeps 100% of the hops and other solids out (less trub)
- Keeps the bulk of the break material out, especially if it is also getting filtered through whole hops (also less trub)
Cons:
- Clogs easily, especially if using pellet hops
- Extra equipment that you may not need for any other purpose
Method 4 - Rack into the fermenter using a siphon
Pros:
- If done right, keeps out 100% of whole hops, and the majority of pellet hops and break material
- If you are a homebrewer then you already have a siphon for racking anyway
- If you want to suck up some cold break material for head retention, you have perfect control over that
- Revvy says he is able to perch the auto-siphon on the 2nd-to-last rung of the wort chiller and thereby avoid all the trub, hassle-free
Cons:
- You have to sanitize your siphon (and any related equipment)
- Can become clogged if you aren't careful
Method 5 - Drain through kettle spigot
Pros:
- No whole hops can make it through
- Very little break material and other sludge makes it through, especially if you whirlpool or use a screen
- Very easy, since it does not require lifting and pouring a several gallon brew kettle, or starting a siphon
Cons:
- You need to have a kettle spigot, which may not be an option for some people
I've done each of the first three, and having not been happy with any of them, I'll be doing the siphon on my next batch. So I may not have the pros and cons right for that method. In any case, any comments? Worth it for the pro/con sticky?