Regardless of the answer, in Michigan at least you aren't allowed to f*ck it.
http://www.mlive.com/news/bctimes/index.ssf?/base/news-8/117231576565120.xml&coll=4
http://www.mlive.com/news/bctimes/index.ssf?/base/news-8/117231576565120.xml&coll=4
Kuch is accused of sexual contact with the carcass of his girlfriend's dog on Oct. 20, about a week after the animal had been hit by a car
beer4breakfast said:Well, if the animal is alive, it's called zoophilia. I have no idea what you call it when the animal is dead.
This is a gross thread.
beer4breakfast said:Yep, I guess that makes sense.
And, this is still a gross thread!
NOVEMBER 22--A Wisconsin man who argued that he could not be prosecuted for having sex with a deer because the animal was dead at the time, was dealt a legal setback today when a judge rejected a motion seeking dismissal of a criminal charge against him. As a result of Circuit Court Judge Michael Lucci's ruling, defendant Bryan James Hathaway, 20, will have to stand trial for his alleged assault last month of the deer carcass. In his ruling (a copy of which you'll find below), Lucci denied a November 7 motion filed by Hathaway's lawyer, Fredric Anderson, which argued that the deer ceased being an animal upon its death (Hathaway, pictured at right, allegedly found the carcass in a roadside ditch). Anderson contended that a charge of sexual gratification with an animal could not be sustained because "the term 'animal' refers to a living organism, not a carcass." Lucci, however, noted that "most people understand that an animal does not necessarily cease being or qualifying as an animal or even being referred to as an animal once it's dead." He added that the "primary focus" of Wisconsin's criminal statute dealing with crimes against sexual morality is on "human behavior and on protecting sexual morality in the community, and not necessarily on animal protection."
the_bird said:boingboing.net.
I can waste time at OTHER sites too, you know
DeadYetiBrew said:Where do you guys think our name came from???
olllllo said:Why are you plural? Is plural the new third-person?
DeadYetiBrew said:Read our introduction post... It's me and my cousin brewing.
t-dogg said:thank you bird for that visual. 10 DAYS!!!!!!!!
DeadYetiBrew said:Read our introduction post... It's me and my cousin brewing.
or your brother...DeadYetiBrew said:It made you hot too? Glad I'm not alone... i was starting to worry about myself...
knipknup said:Come on, we all know it was an accident. He was saying goodbye to his good buddy, reached down to pet him one last time, slipped on some leaves and well, you know... didn't have his thingy tidied up right...
olllllo said:olllllo feels very pleased about using the third person AND plural in this thread. We feel like David Bowie after he created Ziggy Stardust. We find it to be very liberating. olllllo suggests that everybody give it a try somtimes.
We feel as though when olllllo speaks we all speak and that's very powerful.
DeadYetiBrew said:LOL smartass... Yes i know basic memberships are free, but i'm too lazy to get my own... Plus I personally have made most of the posts so...
SOB said:Do both of you use the computer at the same time to surf HBT? f so, I can understand the "we" stuff, but if you are stating your own opinions then maybe you should just use "I".
Atleast that's what SOB thinks, we think SOB is pretty dreamy...
SOB said:So, technically YOU could be having a conversation with HIM in the same thread, but we would think it's the same person and think you're just crazy...
:fro:
Is this like the movie Fight Club where the whole time we think there are 2 ppl when actually there is only one?DeadYetiBrew said:Exactly, and the fact that i am psycho doesn't help either....
SOB said:Is this like the movie Fight Club where the whole time we think there are 2 ppl when actually there is only one?
Flyin' Lion said:You just broke the first rule of fight club.
Enter your email address to join: