TungstenBeer
Well-Known Member
Finally got around to tapping my pale ale tonight... I am a little disappointed with the final outcome, but it's more of a mash mistake (missed and couldn't hold target temp) than a yeast issue. It tastes a little thin, but again, that's a mash error. Plus, I have struggled with lower gravity beers in the past in preventing it from being too thin.
That being said, the beer tastes really clean, and there are no hints of diaceytl as some have mentioned.
Conclusion: I am really excited to use this yeast in a "real" beer and since this is something I plan to use as a "house" yeast for a while, I'm looking forward to a couple higher gravity/higher IBU brews (AB "clone," IPA/IIPA, pacific amber).
That being said, the beer tastes really clean, and there are no hints of diaceytl as some have mentioned.
Conclusion: I am really excited to use this yeast in a "real" beer and since this is something I plan to use as a "house" yeast for a while, I'm looking forward to a couple higher gravity/higher IBU brews (AB "clone," IPA/IIPA, pacific amber).