Rubique
New Member
Hello everyone,
My buddy and I are doing an experiment to quantify the amount of interaction between hops and yeast in IPA's. We are doing four batches of beer that we split in two at the time of dry-hopping for a total of eight 3-gallon sub-batches. We will be using 4 different hops crossed with 2 different yeasts, so there will be a batch for each combination of hops and yeast.
Then we will find 10 IPA fans and they will be instructed to rate each beer. Our model (2-way random effect anova in case anybody cares) goes roughly like this:
rating = average + hops contribution + yeast contribution + interaction of both + error
I selected citra, amarillo, centennial and topaz for hops. This where I seek advice: One of my yeast is denny's favorite 50, and my sister made a point that I should select an ipa-capable yeast that is quite different from it for the second yeast. I was thinking US-05, S-04, maybe something else. Anybody has an opinion on that?
Thanks
My buddy and I are doing an experiment to quantify the amount of interaction between hops and yeast in IPA's. We are doing four batches of beer that we split in two at the time of dry-hopping for a total of eight 3-gallon sub-batches. We will be using 4 different hops crossed with 2 different yeasts, so there will be a batch for each combination of hops and yeast.
Then we will find 10 IPA fans and they will be instructed to rate each beer. Our model (2-way random effect anova in case anybody cares) goes roughly like this:
rating = average + hops contribution + yeast contribution + interaction of both + error
I selected citra, amarillo, centennial and topaz for hops. This where I seek advice: One of my yeast is denny's favorite 50, and my sister made a point that I should select an ipa-capable yeast that is quite different from it for the second yeast. I was thinking US-05, S-04, maybe something else. Anybody has an opinion on that?
Thanks