Ok, I secured an extra bottle of Westvleteren 12, so I cracked open the 2008 vintage one I had for a tasting! This will hold me off from tapping my two brews too early.
Appearance: Dark opaque brown, thick offwhite head (it was almost up to the top of the glass on initial pour) with good carbonation.
Aroma: Bread crust, a little bread dough, some fruity esters, and a hint burnt/candied banana at the end. The banana comes out a little bit more as it warms. No clove.
Flavor: Initial flavors of sweet malt characters that is a little bit like a ripe fig, nice and round and full. Touch of raw cocoa, and a touch of candied banana that fade into a lingering very pleasant finish on a bed of residual sweetness. Kind of like a Belgian Barleywine. Moderately sweet (but balanced with some bitterness), very complex and delicious. No alcohol bite.
Mouthfeel: Full bodied mouthfeel that is not too heavy or oily in the classic monk style. Carbonation level is pretty moderate, it refreshes the palate without getting in the way. Probably 2.6-2.7 volumes.
Overall: Belgian beer is like a sweet almost candi-like refreshment, and this is a great example of such. The beer is so simple and yet so complex at the same time, a true masterpiece of brewing.
Notes for people attempting to recreate this beauty: Its all about the sugar. I can definitely tell that Belgian pilsner and pale malts were used, but the beer is a showcase of the very fine Westmalle yeast and the dark sugar that is used. Hop flavors are *almost* nonexistent and there is some bitterness to keep the beer from being cloying sweet.
If you compare the picture of this beer with my new world beer recipe, I think its really really close. The traditional recipe is obviously way too light. However in flavor, the traditional is much closer. When I mixed the new world and traditional together it was a fairly close overall comparison to the real thing. We'll see what aging time does to these beers.
From left to right: My traditional recipe, my new world recipe, the real thing.