• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Water chemistry Primer questions/advice

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I have a double brew day coming up on Saturday: one IPA and one Porter. Based on reading through this thread again and using 100% Distilled, I plan to go with the following. Any comments? I will follow up after I taste the beer with how they turned out. I have no Sauermalz or a pH meter!! So im flying blind here.

For the Porter: 5.5Gal, 4.5gal Mash, 4gal Sparge
4gms of gypsum and 4gms CaCl2
Total Grain (lb): 12.75
Non-Roasted Spec. Grain: 1
Roasted Grain: 0.75
Beer Color (SRM): 29.2
I am having trouble not adding any Gypsum. So I split the CaCl2 and Gypsum.

For the IPA: 5.5Gal, 4.5gal Mash, 4gal Sparge
8gms of gypsum and 4gms CaCl2
Total Grain (lb): 13
Non-Roasted Spec. Grain: 1
Roasted Grain: 0
Beer Color (SRM): 9.7
I went with more Gypsum in hopes of pulling more bitterness.

Lastly, I remember reading somewhere that Na contributes to body and mouthfeel of a beer. Are there any cons to adding some NaCl?
 
My only comment is that this is a lot of salts but then these are beers that are traditionally brewed with high mineral content water. You do say you are looking for lots of hops so the high levels of gypsum may be appropriate for your brewing. You may, in fact, eventually find you want even more. I would recommend that you also try the recipes with less.

It is chloride that usually gets the credit for the enhancements you mention. In general the reasoning is that you might as well get it paired with beneficial calcium as opposed to, at best, "don't care" sodium but some beers definitely have a hint of saltiness to them. Remember that the goal of the Primer is to get you under control WRT pH. When it comes to the stylistic ions you are on your own!
 
My only comment is that this is a lot of salts but then these are beers that are traditionally brewed with high mineral content water. You do say you are looking for lots of hops so the high levels of gypsum may be appropriate for your brewing. You may, in fact, eventually find you want even more. I would recommend that you also try the recipes with less.

It is chloride that usually gets the credit for the enhancements you mention. In general the reasoning is that you might as well get it paired with beneficial calcium as opposed to, at best, "don't care" sodium but some beers definitely have a hint of saltiness to them. Remember that the goal of the Primer is to get you under control WRT pH. When it comes to the stylistic ions you are on your own!

Doh. My aim was more for 1 gram per gallon. Looks like fudged it.

For the IPA I was going to use 5 gypsum and 3 grams CaCl2. That seems for in line.
 
I don't understand how you got to 5 & 3 for the IPA. I see that you are using a total of 14 gallons water.

I'm still struggling to get a handle on this. The way I read the primer for an IPA with 14 gallons water total, you would add 28 grams of Calcium Chloride (dihydrate) and 28 grams of Gypsum, as well as 2% Acid Malt. Based on RO water. And of course check and adjust the pH after the mash has settled in. What part am I missing?
 
I don't understand how you got to 5 & 3 for the IPA. I see that you are using a total of 14 gallons water.

I'm still struggling to get a handle on this. The way I read the primer for an IPA with 14 gallons water total, you would add 28 grams of Calcium Chloride (dihydrate) and 28 grams of Gypsum, as well as 2% Acid Malt. Based on RO water. And of course check and adjust the pH after the mash has settled in. What part am I missing?

I have 8.5 gallons of water per brew... so I went with 8 grams total. I cant measure to the half of a gram on my scale.

For a Burton beer it says to double the amounts and I am not ready to do so. So for the IPA I will go with 1 gram per gallon and split between gyp and CaCl2.

I came to my determination through reading through the primer. One member (I cant remember who) said they wanted for gypsum in their beer and that is what I had historically done for my water treatments (plus adding gobs of chalk and other salts). So I want to start over using this primer and build upon my water profiles.

I hope to get a pH meter and a pound or two of acid malt by my next brewing day. Then the real fun begins!
 
OK I misread your first post. I missed that the 5.5 gallon is total, then you listed Mash and Sparge. Makes a little more sense now.

I've been doing my best to follow the guidelines, but so far I'm still not sure if I have been getting exactly what AJ suggests. But there is enough room with the addition amounts that so far my beer has improved. I have used 2% acid in all of my mash's since reading this, and my pH has always came in at 5.2-5.4.

Although with my next brew I'm going to mill the acid malt and just have it ready rather than have it in the grist to start. That way I can meter the mash and actually see the pH shift.

So even though I don't have a clear understanding, my beer is much better.
 
ajdelange,

What mash thickness do you typically use? Do you use this thickness on all of your beers?
 
Saccharomyces said:
Since the book just recently came out, one word of caution if following his advice: the water where he lives has about 400ppm of bicarbonate, and about 100ppm of total hardness, which means RO with a 90% rejection rate (typical) will result in 40ppm of bicarb and 10ppm of total hardness. My water is considerably less alkaline, so at best I just need to cut my water with RO, and even then only if I'm doing a light lager. I've won plenty of awards for IPAs to stouts doing very little with my water other than filtering it and adding enough phosphoric acid to drop the pH into the butter zone.

Regardless of whether you use RO or go with tap, your goal should be to have as few salts in the resulting water as possible, and you should be consistent in how you treat your water from brew to brew. The numbers given in the OP as targets are fantastic advice... I think 90% of all grain brewers over-think their water, and their beers actually *suffer* as a result.

Where do you get your phosphoric acid? Star San? :D
 
Saccharomyces said:
...phosphoric acid for everything else since it is flavorless.

Yeah, that's why I asked. I've never actually seen it at any homebrew store though...
 
Made a thread about this, but I should have came here first. I was wondering if someone can tell me if this is a decent water profile for a IPA (10 SRM)? Im going to be using 100% distiller water since I have a water softner. Seems like thats a lot of Gypsum to be adding. This is my first shoot at this so bare with me. Hopefully you can read it.

BrewingWaterIPA_Page_1.jpg


BrewingWaterIPA_Page_2.jpg
 
Did you consider using the included Pale Ale profile as your water guide? I'm brwing an APA this weekend and was going to use that profile but now I'm wondering if some of the ion concentrations are too high - CA of 165 and S04/Cl of 5.5 - which in my case will take 11.5 grams of Gypsum :eek: .
 
Did you consider using the included Pale Ale profile as your water guide? I'm brwing an APA this weekend and was going to use that profile but now I'm wondering if some of the ion concentrations are too high - CA of 165 and S04/Cl of 5.5 - which in my case will take 11.5 grams of Gypsum :eek: .

Actually Im looking at that now for the Pale and everything is low. I finally just got done reading this whole thread (about 2hrs btw), and it sounds like I should just use gypsum and calcium chloride and nothing else at first. But if I do that w/ 100% DI Ill have no Magnesium, Bicarbonate and Alkalinity, but looking at the spreadsheet, looks like they're all benefical, so IDK.

The recipe is 45% Pale Malt, 35% Vienna, 15% Munich II, and 5% Crystal 90, if that matters.
 
I have read through this thread at least twice and probably for the worse, plenty of other threads and sites. I'm about to try my first all-grain batch after only a few extract brews. My first brew, although drinkable, was pretty heavily affected by the chlorine in my tap water. After that I have been using RO/DI water with positive results.

I'd like to continue using RO?DI water (I have a ready supply for my reef aquarium) which is what drew me to this thread. Unfortunately, my brain is currently locked up with all of the conflicting/confusing information. This thread alone strays from ajdelange's "keep it simple" first post to people suggesting, apparently while agreeing with the initial post, complete water profile adjustments. Somewhere along the line the initial theme of the thread got lost (or at least I lost track of it).

So, my plan at this point is to go with the simple formula in the first post. The beer will be Reaper's English Mild:

5 lb 8 oz Maris Otter (Crisp, UK)
1 lb 8 oz Crystal 60L (Crisp, UK)
6 oz Chocolate malt (Crisp, UK)

The primary primer post suggests the baseline addition of 1 tsp of calcium chloride dihydrate. Now since it is a british beer I would add 1 tsp gypsum to that. And since it has roasted malt I would exclude the usual baseline 2% saurmalz. Does that sound right? Is there enough roasted malt to justify exclusion of the full 2% of the sauermalz?

My concern is with the mash ph. After much reading I'm convinced of the importance of the mash ph. Unfortunately, that comes with the side-affect of being afraid of totally botching it with out measuring it. However, it also became clear that the +/- .2 or worse accuracy of test strips and cheap meters isn't going to be of much use and is a poor value. I can't currently afford a meter with sufficient accuracy (although I found the Milwaukee ph53 which is only $65 + the necessary solutions). Given the above grain bill and doctored RO water how likely am I to have mash ph issues?

I'm sure I'm over-thinking everything given that this is my first all grain brew. I just need reassurance :D
 
My concern is with the mash ph. After much reading I'm convinced of the importance of the mash ph. Unfortunately, that comes with the side-affect of being afraid of totally botching it with out measuring it. However, it also became clear that the +/- .2 or worse accuracy of test strips and cheap meters isn't going to be of much use and is a poor value. I can't currently afford a meter with sufficient accuracy (although I found the Milwaukee ph53 which is only $65 + the necessary solutions). Given the above grain bill and doctored RO water how likely am I to have mash ph issues?

The roast malt is only a minor concern. The primary concern is the huge addition of crystal malt. I brewed that recipe a few months ago using RO water and fortunately I use Bru'n Water to evaluate the mash performance beforehand. I knew I would need to be ready to prevent too great a pH drop. Upon mashing in and checking mash pH with my calibrated meter, sure enough the pH was down in the 4.9 to 5.0 range (room temp measurement). I was ready with the precalculated pickling lime addition and brought the pH to a more appropriate 5.3 pH.

I laud AJ for getting brewers to simplify their brewing water practices, but even that practice will get brewers in trouble if they don't understand the cause and effect of water and grain. This Primer is a good start. A good brewer will build upon this by advancing their brewing water knowledge to the next level with Bru'n Water.

PS: You absolutely want to delete the acid malt addition from this brew. This is a beer that WILL require alkalinity and does not need any more acidity. AJ's rule of thumb will be very sore for many brewers in this case.
 
That really helps ease my worries :D

I'm thinking now that I'll just start out reconstituting my RO water to a particular balanced water profile and tweak it as I learn.

I downloaded brunwater but it is quite a bit over my head right now. I have read quite a few good reviews of it though and some day I'm sure it will be a valuable tool for me.

My assumption has been that most brewers don't measure pH. if Reaper's Mild recipe inherently leads to low ph, how are most brewers handling this? I guess I'm not certain of what the consequences of lower ph are. Is it more than poor efficiency? Are non-ph-measuring brewers just not making as good a beer as the recipe is capable of producing?
 
Even when brewing with RO water, the pH drop would only make the resulting beer a little more tart than a drinker may prefer, but it would still be quite drinkable. The good thing about the Primer is that you won't make an undrinkable beer. This is in contrast to advice that you can pick up and miss-use from other sources that can lead to very poor beer.

For brewers that have higher alkalinity water, the Reaper's Mild recipe is probably going to produce very nice beer.
 
I'm thinking now that I'll just start out reconstituting my RO water to a particular balanced water profile and tweak it as I learn.

At the risk of getting you even more confused the issue here is really the variability of the malts. The water is, by comparison, quite simple and, within certain bounds (outside of which home brewers seldom venture), well understood. The bottom line is that you can't predict mash pH with a rule of thumb and you can't predict it with a spreadsheet unless you have measured the titratable acidity of every malt in the grist. As that's not practical, the spreadsheets must model, for example, 60L caramel malt as having a certain acidity. Some lots from some harvests from some maltsters will behave close to the way the models predict and some won't. And this pertains to base malts as well as specialty malts. I've measured Maris Otter base only DI mash pH as low as 5.6 and I've measured 5.7 in the mash tun in a grist using 95% Maris Otter and 5% 60L crystal which implies that that batch of MO had a much higher DI water pH. Thus Martin's statement that you will definitely need alkalinity isn't necessarily true though it represents a reasonable prediction given that you are using a lot of 60L crystal.

You can only guess whether a particular rule of thumb or spreadsheet (I haven't seen one that asks about base malt DI water mash pH) will get you to the mash pH you desire and in case you haven't figured out where this is going yet, it's a pitch to sacrifice some other aspect of life (if you have a life outside brewing) and get a pH meter. This is the only way to be sure what is actually happening. By the use of a pH meter you effectively measure the titratable acidity of the grist components in the matrix in which they are to be employed but do it implicitly i.e. no acidity calculation is necessary - you get the mash pH value and that's what you are after.

I downloaded brunwater but it is quite a bit over my head right now. I have read quite a few good reviews of it though and some day I'm sure it will be a valuable tool for me.

You don't set out learning how to play the piano by tacking the Goldberg Variations and you don't jump into brewing water chemistry at the same level as Charlie Bamforth. What the spreadsheets can teach you is what the relationships between alkalinity, pH, malt acidity, added acids, dilution water etc. are for example if I have a liter water at pH 8.3 with a given alkalinity and hardness (and sulfate....)and add x grams of 2% sauermalz and a liter of a different (RO or spring) water with a lower alkalinity and hardness (and other mineral composition) to it what will the pH of the new water be and what is the likely effect on mash tun pH. This is very instructive. Where it falls down is that the Sauermalz I am using may have acid content anywhere from 1 - 3% (2% is sort of an average) and if I haven't specified the titratable acidity of the base (and other malts) I cannot accurately predict mash pH. But you can learn the relationship between, in this example, dilution water, sauermalz and mash pH.

All the comments about spreadsheets go, of course, in spades for the rule of thumb approach as well. The primer is based on hours with spreadsheets, hours in the lab and hours in the brewery. But it's still a bunch of rules of thumb.


My assumption has been that most brewers don't measure pH.

That's true and it includes professional ones. I even gave a meter to the local gastropub guy because he brews the some of the same beers I do with essentially the same water and ignores pH. I know his beers could be better if he used enough sauermalz to get the pH into the "correct" range but he wasn't taught that way. OTOH the local Gordon Biersch (also using the same water) does control mash pH (with sauermalz)

Are non-ph-measuring brewers just not making as good a beer as the recipe is capable of producing?

That, in a nutshell, is it exactly.

Some of the earliest spreadsheets advised such absurd levels of added alkalinity that beers produced with them must have been (and have been reported to me as being) pretty bad but the newer spreadsheets, such as Bru'n Water, have toned that down considerably.

Despite my stubborn refusal to add alkali to my beers I've never experienced a mash pH that was too low but then I would never use as much as 21% 60L crystal in a beer either so I can't comment on what happens if mash pH is too low. When people started following the primer recommendations (and thus lowering what had been high mash pH's into the proper range) I started getting reports back to the effect that "all the flavors are brighter" and I really think that says it best.
 
At the risk of getting you even more confused the issue here is really the variability of the malts. The water is, by comparison, quite simple and, within certain bounds (outside of which home brewers seldom venture), well understood. The bottom line is that you can't predict mash pH with a rule of thumb and you can't predict it with a spreadsheet unless you have measured the titratable acidity of every malt in the grist.

This actually helps a lot. I'm okay with uncertainty as long as I know to expect it :) .

It figures that I would select a chemically unusual grain bill for my first all-grain brew. Maybe I'll try something a bit more mainstream, maybe EdWort's Haus Pale Ale (also on my brewing schedule) first.

You can only guess whether a particular rule of thumb or spreadsheet (I haven't seen one that asks about base malt DI water mash pH) will get you to the mash pH you desire and in case you haven't figured out where this is going yet, it's a pitch to sacrifice some other aspect of life (if you have a life outside brewing) and get a pH meter. This is the only way to be sure what is actually happening. By the use of a pH meter you effectively measure the titratable acidity of the grist components in the matrix in which they are to be employed but do it implicitly i.e. no acidity calculation is necessary - you get the mash pH value and that's what you are after.

You stated several times in this thread that one of your goals was to get people to measure their ph. You have convinced me. I'll talk to SWMBO about getting a ph meter to assuage my guilt, purchase a ph meter, measure the mash ph to monitor for the uncertain chemistry of the grain bill, and adjust accordingly.

For general practice I'll pick up some sauermalz (although it's pretty unlikely apparently that I'll need some for Reaper's mild recipe). Another useful thing gleaned from these great replies (and thanks to everyone :mug: ) is the use of pickling lime for raising ph (a useful thread on that topic is here). I have more than sufficient supply of calcium hydroxide at hand from my reef aquarium hobby but no chalk.

Another general question. Given that I have the minerals on-hand, should I start with a more complex water profile with this first all-grain batch or just start-simple with RO+ CaCl2 + CaSO4 ? If I hadn't visited ajdelange's website and see the long list of locale water profies I'd be more convinced of the "go simple" argument ;) .

Thanks again to all of the great replies (and to the forums in general). I know that it's usually good advice to just "jump in" and learn from experience but it's my natural inclination to research and contemplate to try to get a head start on the learning curve. Given that it can take 2-6 weeks to see the results of any experiment (another hot topic of debate here) I figure it's more than worth the time. Plus I enjoy it. Probably my mostly useless physics degree asserting itself.
 
Maybe I'll try something a bit more mainstream

A good idea


You stated several times in this thread that one of your goals was to get people to measure their ph. You have convinced me. I'll talk to SWMBO about getting a ph meter to assuage my guilt,

I usually confine my advice to brewing advice but there are many ways to convince SWMBO that she needs a pH meter in the house. Have you heard, for example, that the pH of the bath water is key to radiant skin and beautiful hair? Or that botulism spores can't sprout (or whatever it is they do) below a certain pH? You get the idea.


Another general question. Given that I have the minerals on-hand, should I start with a more complex water profile with this first all-grain batch or just start-simple with RO+ CaCl2 + CaSO4 ? If I hadn't visited ajdelange's website and see the long list of locale water profies I'd be more convinced of the "go simple" argument ;) .

Hoist with my own petard! I did indeed struggle with elaborate water preparation procedures until I saw the light (i.e. the kiss approach). After 25 yrs or so trying to figure out how to simplify all that math and explain it to brewers I concluded one can't and it was Yooper's request for a simple explanation of the subject, i.e. the one that appears here, that really turned on the light for me.

Plus I enjoy it.

That's a good sign.

Probably my mostly useless physics degree asserting itself.

Put it to use! It's all about p-chem ultimately.
 
I'm loving this thread also, but had a question about Na. I have typical soft well water, and I generally add a teaspoon of CaCl2 and a teaspoon of gypsum just to the 4 or 5 gallons of original mash water. Based on my Ward report, this brings my estimated Room Temp mash pH to 5.59 (using the EZ Water Calc 3.0). Ca, Cl and SO4 are at 59, 55, and 69 respectively, which seems good if you went by general recommendations (specifically Palmer, but I know these aren't always the best to go by).

But my sodium is only 5 ppm. Do people worry about Na with soft water?

With a 5.59 pH, might it be worthwhile to add a half teaspoon of Sodium Bicarbonate (bringing Na up to 48 and pH up to 5.67) and then adding 4 oz (2%) acidulated malt to bring the pH back down to 5.46?

Something is still "missing" in my brews, and I'm considering doing this for my next batch, which will be an American Blonde Ale (the lightest beer I've brewed to date). Might that be a mistake?
 
I wouldn't add any salt, my water makes great light lagers/ales and my sodium level is only 3. In fact for my house lager, I only use calcium chloride(just to get me up to 50ppm) and 3oz of acid malt to get the proper ph.
Less is more in very light beers.


_
 
Something is still "missing" in my brews, and I'm considering doing this for my next batch, which will be an American Blonde Ale (the lightest beer I've brewed to date). Might that be a mistake?

Probably would be but not from the sodium. At modest levels, sodium is a "don't care" ion. Bicarbonate is almost always a problem, however, as it raises mash pH relative to where it would be without bicarb.

Of course I can't tell for sure what is missing from your beers but I'll note that many who have adopted the recommendations of the Primer here have noted that "all the flavors are brighter" in their beers. That was my impression too when I started a serious campaign to control mash pH. You are, with your soft water, a good candidate for those recommendations and you might want to give them a shot. You'll need small amounts of Sauermalz.
 
Probably would be but not from the sodium. At modest levels, sodium is a "don't care" ion. Bicarbonate is almost always a problem, however, as it raises mash pH relative to where it would be without bicarb.

Of course I can't tell for sure what is missing from your beers but I'll note that many who have adopted the recommendations of the Primer here have noted that "all the flavors are brighter" in their beers. That was my impression too when I started a serious campaign to control mash pH. You are, with your soft water, a good candidate for those recommendations and you might want to give them a shot. You'll need small amounts of Sauermalz.

I'm on it! Will report back in about 4 weeks.
 
Back
Top