• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

The stupidest comment on your beer

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
day_trippr said:
Hardly, son. Add up what I've paid in taxes over a 40 year career and most people would piss their pjs.

But reality is reality, no getting 'round it...

Cheers!

Sweet, I'm going to quit my job. It sounds like you can support both of us :D
 
5 gallons is impossible. You'd die of alcohol poisoning. 18 beers on the other hand is not that far fetched. I work with a guy that says he drinks 30 cans of bud every Friday and Saturday. When I played in a dart league, I would routinely drink 18 or more. Now that I'm married and have kids, I'm never out long enough to drink more than 10. I have drank a whole TAD bottle in one sitting though which is quite a bit. Maybe I should stop with my drinking stories now.

I think its possible. I drank a LOT of beer while I was in college. I'd bet I came damn close to 5 gallons one St Pattys day.
 
jimmarshall said:
I have a recipe for an all grain triple ipa I can't wait to try once I get into all grain.... >11%, anticipated IBU 387.6

Lol that's pretty much out of control! Your mouth would turn into a permanent pucker!
Aren't our taste buds not even able to recognize anything much over 70 IBU's? Thought I read that somewhere
 
malweth said:
Let me FTFY:

So 387 IBUs is a theoretical number you'd never actually reach.

What's a triple IPA at 11% ABV but an American Barleywine anyway? I bet it'll age nicely...

I disagree, because the malt profiles are drastically different. I've brewed a 16% IPA that was well attenuated and still drank just like an IPA should. A Barleywine is malt forward, and IPA is not.
 
Barleywines do not have high drinkability as often as IIPAs do. That is another big distinction... how easy the beer drinks. I do think that when you start going for 11-16% IIPAs, you have a completely different beast than the typical 8-9%-er's we're used to. More of what they would call "Strong Ale".

In fact, all of these are different beasts of varying levels of intensity:

Extra IPA - 7.5% ish
Double IPA - 8-9.5%
Imperial IPA - 10-13%
Strong Ale - higher than 13%
 
Double IPA =IIPA.

Agree. The quotes below seem off to me:

Barleywines do not have high drinkability as often as IIPAs do. That is another big distinction... how easy the beer drinks. I do think that when you start going for 11-16% IIPAs, you have a completely different beast than the typical 8-9%-er's we're used to. More of what they would call "Strong Ale".

In fact, all of these are different beasts of varying levels of intensity:

Extra IPA - 7.5% ish
Double IPA - 8-9.5%
Imperial IPA - 10-13%
Strong Ale - higher than 13%

As mentioned DIPA and IIPA are the same thing (and exist in and below the DIPA range you've given). Extra IPA doesn't really exist IMO. Per BJCP, barleywines are 8-12% (though I personally think that range could be extended past 12% in some cases - especially for American Barleywines).

I disagree, because the malt profiles are drastically different. I've brewed a 16% IPA that was well attenuated and still drank just like an IPA should. A Barleywine is malt forward, and IPA is not.

Well enough, but was it really an IPA? American Barleywine (not British, as you appear to be describing) can range from malty to bitter forward and hoppy. A fresh Bigfoot is a good example of an ABW that's bitter forward.

See http://www.bjcp.org/2008styles/style19.php#1c
 
In fact, all of these are different beasts of varying levels of intensity:

Extra IPA - 7.5% ish
Double IPA - 8-9.5%
Imperial IPA - 10-13%
Strong Ale - higher than 13%

As noted, Double IPA=IIPA=Imperial IPA . According to BJCP, Strong Ale includes Old Ale (6%-9%+) and English and American Barleywine (8-12%+).
 
It tastes like beer....No **** I said I made beer it's almost as if they expect something nasty and disgusting.
 
malweth said:
Well enough, but was it really an IPA? American Barleywine (not British, as you appear to be describing) can range from malty to bitter forward and hoppy. A fresh Bigfoot is a good example of an ABW that's bitter forward.
It really was an IPA. The grain bill was 20 lbs 2-row, 8 ounces of C10, a crapload of sugar and a buncha hops. Bigfoot has a bunch of Munich and several pounds of specialty malts for a 5 gallon clone. Just being hop forward does not mean that BBW and my beer have anything in common besides both being hoppy. They certainly aren't the same style. This beer was light (1.00 measured FG) and highly drinkable. I do not consider drinkability to in any way synonymous with Barleywine.

image-2322858479.jpg


image-874914267.jpg
 
Fizzycist said:
^ Saw that coming.

I'm the guy enjoying the stupid beer comments, not the guy enjoying the esoteric argument on the vagaries of DIPA vs. IIPA vs. Barley Wine. I think that one is you.

I'm sorry if everything isn't exactly as you would like it. There was no arguing taking place, at most there was a disagreement. This thread goes dormant for weeks and months at a time, so if it is that important to you maybe go to the bar and strike up conversations with people about brewing and report back.

My boss tried to talk to me about the Guinness black lager a couple weeks ago, and he said that it tasted "Burnt, because they used those black hops in it". :drunk: I wasn't in the mood to disagree.
 
Back
Top