tre9er
Well-Known Member
yeah, start small, wait days, be patient.
yeah, start small, wait days, be patient.
I'm brewing this tomorrow I was suppose to use pacman but it never showed in the mail so ill be using dennys favorite 50. I'm trying with using some sugar to dry it out as mentioned earlier but I've never done it so I'm a little apprehensive.
I'm brewing this tomorrow I was suppose to use pacman but it never showed in the mail so ill be using dennys favorite 50. I'm trying with using some sugar to dry it out as mentioned earlier but I've never done it so I'm a little apprehensive.
I'd venture to say you're there. Taste the sample? If it's good, you're good. If it's sweet, you can TRY to pitch more yeast, say, nottingham, then keep it in the low 70's. Personally, if you really want to go lower, try 2 drops of amylase enzyme, JUST 2 drops. Then check again in 3 days.
jaydog2314 said:Brewed today and it was looking good after the mash. I mashed at 151.5 pre boil gravity est was 1.060. I came in at 1.062. My SG was estimated at 1.075 but came in short of that at about 1.069/1.070 not too far off just not sure how I ended short. Maybe I boiled too vigorously. First time my pre boil has been high but SG low. My amount were pretty damn close too. 7.1 pre boil I hit that. Post boil was suppose to be just under 6 I came in just over 6. I know it's close. I'm just hoping my FG gets down low enough to put me back in the bjcp standards for IIPA as I was hoping to enter this one in a competition.
jaydog2314 said:AH thanks for pointing that I had it backwards. I did turn it down to mid boil b/c I thought I was boiling off too much, oh well add that to the list of things learned! Thanks Carlscan26
paarman said:Well, I just dry hopped mine on Sunday, so I have about a week before bottling. This will be my 4th brew, but this one was the one I ran into the most issues with, and I'm a little worried on how this one will turn out.
My biggest regret is that I did not have a yeast starter. Kind of my own fault, but I was a little unprepared compared to previous brews, but this one was kind of last minute picked out and had to pick up supplies at my LHBS. Used WLP002 yeast since that was probably the closest/best bet from what I had to choose from. Anyway, a few hours before pitching, I took a little DME (all I had on hand) and the yeast, and put them into a container with some water and shook it up to try to get it active as soon as I could.
2nd mistake was that I heated up the water too high and my mash temp for the first 20 minutes or so was way too high. I was expecting once the grain was added that the temp would drop ~13*, and it didn't. Mash temp was 158-163, and I tried to add as much water as I could, but my pot wasn't big enough to add any more cold water to bring it down so my only option was to wait it out. It probably was around 152* for 20-30 minutes at most during the mash. This is where I think my error may have been, not enough starch conversion, or I killed too many sugars.
My SG came to 1.060, but this was probably about 6 gallons so I estimate it was a little higher, but I don't know just how much. When I took a gravity reading after 2 weeks in the primary, it was 1.028. When books tell you to "forget" about your beer once it's fermenting to not make it seem like you're waiting so long, well I actually sort of did for once-but wish I hadn't so I would have remembered to take a couple gravity readings prior to moving to a secondary and dry hopping!
My question is, do I just leave it and see how it turns out? Will it ferment a little yet to get the FG down? IIs it too late to even try to get it to drop the FG with 6 days left before bottling? I just checked on it and there is some krausen on the surface, and it looks like its churning a little bit. I recognize some of the mistakes I made, and despite those I did try it and still tastes pretty good except its a little sweeter-unfermented sugars I presume. Any thoughts from you guys?
If there's some krausen on top your gravity is probably still dropping. It could have restarted when you transferred to the secondary. There's no harm in letting it finish up in the secondary. The only thing is some of your dry hopping might be driven off from it still fermenting. I definitely wouldn't bottle with your OG at 1.028. Try and warm it up to get that gravity lower before bottling.
Just took a reading now, and it looks like its at about 1.026. Should I haul it upstairs to the 70* then? I am *supposed* to bottle Sunday, if I follow the directions.. Should I delay bottling, and if so for how long?
I must say, however this beer turns out, it still tastes damn good.. Took a sip after my reading, and it certainly tastes like an IPA.. Its been so long since I've had Ruination though, I don't know how similar it actually tastes.
I've been drinking this for several weeks now. Mine used mostly Pale Ale malt instead of regular 2-row. I now think that is a mistake for this brew. While still good, the slightly maltier profile of the Pale Ale malt keeps it from being exactly like Ruination. And like I surmised, it goes down way too easy for an 8% brew.
Rich
msa8967 said:So I am a bit confused. Does pale ale malt have a maltier profile than standard 2-row? I thought it might be the other way around. I have plenty of regular 2-row that I could use for this recipe but I am short on pale ale malt.