In a couple weekends I'm planning to do my first step-up mash. I'll be using 35% rye malt so I'd like to do a beta glucan rest before heading for saccharification. Thing is, I have two choices and not enough experience to decide between them: Mash in my 10gal Igloo and add boiling water to get from ~110F to ~153F, or mash in the boil kettle on the stove and transfer to the Igloo for lautering. Here's how I see it:
-If I mash in the Igloo I can start thick (<=1qt/lb) and end up thin but reasonable after the boiling water additions (~2qt/lb) which is OK. But I'm a little worried about the effect of adding ~3gal of really hot water on enzyme denaturation and tannin extraction. (Some portion of the mash will be exposed to way high temps between many iterations of pour/stir.)
-If I mash under direct heat, I guess the only down-side is that I'll have to physically transfer 12lb of grain and 4-ish gallons of water from the brew pot to the Igloo, which will take some extra time. On the plus side, a lower volume of water in the mash (since I don't need to add water to add heat) means a better sparge volume.
Right now I'm inclined to suck it up and mash in the brew pot, but I'm curious what you would do. Opinions?
-If I mash in the Igloo I can start thick (<=1qt/lb) and end up thin but reasonable after the boiling water additions (~2qt/lb) which is OK. But I'm a little worried about the effect of adding ~3gal of really hot water on enzyme denaturation and tannin extraction. (Some portion of the mash will be exposed to way high temps between many iterations of pour/stir.)
-If I mash under direct heat, I guess the only down-side is that I'll have to physically transfer 12lb of grain and 4-ish gallons of water from the brew pot to the Igloo, which will take some extra time. On the plus side, a lower volume of water in the mash (since I don't need to add water to add heat) means a better sparge volume.
Right now I'm inclined to suck it up and mash in the brew pot, but I'm curious what you would do. Opinions?