dmcman73
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2013
- Messages
- 936
- Reaction score
- 184
Did I ever mention anything about beer stone?? I don't know what you're trying to argue. My original post said that StarSan doesn't passivate stainless steel. That is still true. I did not mention anything about StarSan and beer stone.
Again I'm trying to get across the misnomer that StarSan passivates stainless and that it needs to be done before use; it does not.
If you go back to my post, #8, I said at the end: "To me it doesn't look pitted, it looks like beer stone which is common on non-passivated stainless steel."
OP posted his chonical was pitted and posted a picture. I said, and a few others agreed, that it did not look pitted but it looked like, in my opinion, it had beer stone. I went on to describe how to "passivate" it to prevent beer stone in where you jumped in arguing that passivating stainless to prevent oxidation (which was not the topic) was not necessary, I was discussing....beer stone remediation and prevention.
The term to "passivate" in the home brew community is used loosely. Lets see if we can get equipment manufacturers and others in the industry to stop calling it passivation and start calling it something else for beer stone cleaning and prevention.
I am not discussing Oxidation. Everything you stated in regards to OXIDATION in stainless is correct, I am NOT saying it is not correct.
Here are some posts with pictures of Beer stone, which is what the OP's conical looks to have:
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/showthread.php?t=241048
http://www.thebruery.com/fermenters-new-or-old/
http://www.brewersfriend.com/2013/08/16/dude-your-beer-line-stinks-wash-it-out/