• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Spot the Space Station

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Well that's interesting, I think SpaceX web people are drunk today. First it said, 5:21 at Vandenberg, now it says 7:30 at at Cape Canaveral. Then I get an email that it's at 7:46 at Vandenberg again.

Here's my prediction, somewhere at some time a rocket might be launched!

Space is hard 🤣
 
A small compilation of nebulas photographed by Hubble over the years. Look like candy :)

1721002235884.png


Cheers!
 
If the Star liner doesn't come back to earth, how they going to know if it'll land successfully? Another procedure Boeing didn't fully test.
It'll return, but without crew onboard. If it doesn't make it, same outcome as scuttling in space somewhere. Failure with crew onboard is a MASSIVE PR issue that will end Boeing's manned space program. It might be done now anyway. God knows they have enough problems with aircraft inside our atmosphere.
 
It'll return, but without crew onboard. If it doesn't make it, same outcome as scuttling in space somewhere. Failure with crew onboard is a MASSIVE PR issue that will end Boeing's manned space program. It might be done now anyway. God knows they have enough problems with aircraft inside our atmosphere.
It was a sarcastic comment. I'm sure Boeing wants to get the module back. All the testing they done back on earth as to why the thrusters weren't working correctly hasn't helped them solve the issues.

It's such a shame all the time and money invested in the program and to show for it they have two astronauts on a extended stay. I'm glad they made it there safely. I wonder what the two of them really think . . .
 
Last edited:
Space is hard, and there is always a risk of failure and loss of life. When all systems are considered 100% and it happens, it's a tragedy. When there are multiple known problems and uncertainties, and the public is aware of them, failure with loss of life looks like negligence, especially considering there was another intact craft to return the astronauts.
 
Poor Boeing. I guess when they installed the software on this forlorn Starliner, Boeing managers felt there was no need for the "autonomous return to Earth" function (they have demonstrated this feature in the past on unmanned Starliner flights). Sooo, it can't do that right now. It will need a firmware update if crew comes back on SpaceX Dragon.

"... the current flight software on board Starliner cannot perform an automated undocking from the space station and entry into Earth’s atmosphere."
"... sources described the process to update the software on Starliner as "non-trivial" and "significant," and that it could take up to four weeks."


https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/...the-launch-of-crew-9-due-to-starliner-issues/
 
Poor Boeing. I guess when they installed the software on this forlorn Starliner, Boeing managers felt there was no need for the "autonomous return to Earth" function (they have demonstrated this feature in the past on unmanned Starliner flights). Sooo, it can't do that right now. It will need a firmware update if crew comes back on SpaceX Dragon.

"... the current flight software on board Starliner cannot perform an automated undocking from the space station and entry into Earth’s atmosphere."
"... sources described the process to update the software on Starliner as "non-trivial" and "significant," and that it could take up to four weeks."


https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/...the-launch-of-crew-9-due-to-starliner-issues/
I like the paragraph towards the end about Boeing noting all the testing they have done since the launch. I'm sure there's lots of high fives and patting each on their backs over their successful testing.

Pitiful, not much more anyone can say.
 
If the Star liner doesn't come back to earth, how they going to know if it'll land successfully? Another procedure Boeing didn't fully test.
It's landed autonomously before. Two Orbital Flight Tests (OFT) were conducted. The first one had software issues and could not dock with the ISS, but it did land successfully. The second one, in 2022, docked with the ISS, then the capsule returned to earth and landed successfully. Both of these were unmanned.
 
It's landed autonomously before. Two Orbital Flight Tests (OFT) were conducted. The first one had software issues and could not dock with the ISS, but it did land successfully. The second one, in 2022, docked with the ISS, then the capsule returned to earth and landed successfully. Both of these were unmanned.
It would nice if they could get it back, landing back on earth safely but unmanned just in case.
 
Space is hard, and there is always a risk of failure and loss of life. When all systems are considered 100% and it happens, it's a tragedy. When there are multiple known problems and uncertainties, and the public is aware of them, failure with loss of life looks like negligence, especially considering there was another intact craft to return the astronauts.
The question is do these known issues appreciably increase the inherent risk.

I’d happily go up if they need some return ballast.
 
The question is do these known issues appreciably increase the inherent risk.

I’d happily go up if they need some return ballast.
I think those two crew would be back on terra firma right now if there were no safety concerns.

Apparently NASA has postponed their crew replacement for the ISS due to this Starliner issue (SpaceX makes the round trip with the 4-person replacements). They might only fly 2 up there, making room for the 2 castaways on the return flight.
 
I think those two crew would be back on terra firma right now if there were no safety concerns.

Apparently NASA has postponed their crew replacement for the ISS due to this Starliner issue (SpaceX makes the round trip with the 4-person replacements). They might only fly 2 up there, making room for the 2 castaways on the return flight.
The Crew 9 space flight was going to be a six month stay, are they revising the return flight for the Star liner crew?
 
It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall in the room where they have these logistics conversations. There would be what really is going on, and later the decisions on what they say publicly.
 
I'm pretty sure I've seen this movie. At this point one of two things happens: (A) while wiling away the hours and having heartfelt tear jerking Zoom calls with loved ones on Earth, they gaze out the window and see the super cell global weather catastrophe approaching Europe; or, (2) the micrometeorioid impacts a closed off agronomic space station module, and the alien life form proceeds to wreak havoc.
 
The more I read about Starliner and the two stranded, the skipper and Gilligan come to mind.

Where's the professor in all this?
Right. By now, he would have rigged a coconut, some bamboo, and some flotsum from the lagoon into a return vessel. (of course, just before launch, Gilligan would press the wrong button and it would leave without the castaways. Oh, before it comes up, def MaryAnn.
 
That's the hard part.

That was the point of my post.

Who knew spacesuits were craft-specific, ffs?

And eff Starliner. Cut it loose and burn that beyotch to a crisp and let the ashes drown. Speaking of which - do you know they never really validated the whole NEW thermal reentry package (what used to be called the "heat shield" but is WAAY different now)? A whole 'nuther reason NOT to bring the two astronauts home on it...
 
I was just sitting out back admiring the VERY bright full moon. One of my kids, when they were young, said the moon is a mirror. This is how teachers make kids understand that that bright moon is not generating its own light - just reflecting it.

Anyway, I also wondered what it would take to blow the moon out of the sky, and what resulting effects would be. Actually a lot of content out there on the subject. Lots of youtube if you want the deep dive.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/starts...arth-would-change-if-our-moon-were-destroyed/
 
Last edited:
That was the point of my post.

Who knew spacesuits were craft-specific, ffs?

And eff Starliner. Cut it loose and burn that beyotch to a crisp and let the ashes drown. Speaking of which - do you know they never really validated the whole NEW thermal reentry package (what used to be called the "heat shield" but is WAAY different now)? A whole 'nuther reason NOT to bring the two astronauts home on it...

Blame NASA. They don't build ANY of this stuff - their only job is to coordinate the efforts of private biz. The late great Harry Browne was right: anything govt does, it botches.
 
Blame NASA. They don't build ANY of this stuff - their only job is to coordinate the efforts of private biz. The late great Harry Browne was right: anything govt does, it botches.
True that, but NASA is doing a terrible job at coordinating this segment of the Starliner project. Boeing bears a lot of blame too, I'm sure our tax dollars won't be refunded from this mess.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top