• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Specialty Grains and fermentation.

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
An easy way to take care of this is to dry it out using dextrose (i.e. corn sugar, "priming" sugar) in the boil.

I just did a Search on "the curse of 1.020" and I found a Thread from the year 2008 in HBT . It was discussed by many members who had the same problem and the best cure was to rouse the yeast cake and bringing the temperature some degrees up .

Hector
 
I just did a Search on "the curse of 1.020" and I found a Thread from the year 2008 in HBT . It was discussed by many members who had the same problem and the best cure was to rouse the yeast cake and bringing the temperature some degrees up .

Hector

Sure.... but A) it doesn't always work and thus dextrose is sometimes needed, and B) I have found faaaaar too many discrepencies between 2011 "common knowledge" and 2008 and earlier "common knowledge." Information and standards shift very quickly in such a booming hobby. Hell, ask anybody 5 years ago if they use dry yeast and they would scoff at you... they would scoff you into the ground.
 
I did three extract batches, or extract with steeping grain, and don't recall having trouble reaching full attenuation. So I don't know about any connection between extract or steeping and the 1020 curse.

However, my fourth batch, and my first all grain, is currently stuck at 1020. My experience bears out some of the experiment that was linked to above. With this batch, I achieved unheard of mash/lauter efficiency--97%, meaning that I extracted within one gravity point of the maximum OG for my grain bill. So, with so much sugar extracted from my grist, why is it that my yeast (1272) is attenuating only 63%, rather than the 72-76% cited by Wyeast?

For one, it's because I purposefully mashed my grains at 154, for a more dextrinous wort. I knew from the start my wort would be less fermentable than a wort from a lower, longer mash. But I believed that I'd still be within the 72-76% attenuation range for this yeast, and I was wrong.

Another piece of the puzzle, I now believe, is the fact that 20% of my grain bill were malts that yield less fermentable sugars. CaraPils (5% of my recipe) is billed as a malt that increases body, so that should have tipped me off. According to a few posts on HBT and other forums, Munich malt (15% of my recipe) seems to result in a less fermentable wort, though accounts are not entirely conclusive. (If anyone reading has the straight dope on Munich, I'd appreciate knowing more.)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top