Not necessarily. But here's something I read recently in the Kunze book...
"Furthermore, as well as cellulose, the husks also contain polyphenols and other components which create an unpleasant bitter taste and have a negative​ effect on the colloidal stability of the beer."
And he goes on the say this about keeping the husks and acrospire as intact as possible...
"thus increasing the elasticity of the husk. As a result, no damage to the acrospire occurs during comminution, and thus there is no, or at least considerably reduced, release of lipids."
So my goal when milling for my own beer (not my bro in law's) is to leave as much of the husks intact as I can. That's why I condition before milling.[/QUOTE[
That post isn't helping the newer brewer, bub, without clarification.
Tannins are a polyphenol. The primary source of tannins/detrimental polyphenols is the husk.
Milling, of any sort, is going to mame the husk and leave them in the mash.
In an utopian universe, the husk could be separated from the grain during milling (which is possible with commercial equipment), but we don't live there. Keeping your mash in an appropriate pH range (<5.8) and at a reasonable SG range (say >1.03) will minimize the possibility of tannin extraction from husks.
And I'm ignoring the fact that Kunze is erroneous on many points. CV people need to stop quoting the thing as gospel.