First of all.. You are using the term 'hypocrisy' improperly... For that to have merit, you have to show that I am guilty of doing something that I say is wrong.. But for the record, 'all' men are hypocrites.. we only differ in degree and area of specialty.. and your calling another a hypocrite (especially another you know nothing about) is the epitome of hypocrisy... But that is something you have been trained to do.. It is a reactionary argument..
Secondly, can you show where I am unable to 'listen' to views other than my own? You are confusing 'disagreeing' with those views as not listening..
As far a young people being smarter than I think they am.. define what you mean by 'smart'.. If you mean the ability to discern or wisdom, then no they are not. That is something that takes 'time' and experience.. If you mean intelligence, then that has nothing to do with age... that is genetics.. if you mean 'educated'.. then that is only relevant in light of what they have been taught, and by whom, and for what purpose...
I have noticed a trend over the last several decades where kids are taught 'what' to think in school now, where as they were at one time taught 'how' to think.. They can no longer make a rational choice on an issue apart from an emotional argument... The thought process is almost entirely 'reactionary'.. as your arguments are case in point...
Pervert means to use in a non-intended way.. Or it also means to use in a non-standard or accepted way... I could easily use the same term to describe what activist judges do when they try and legislate from the bench by distorting a laws original intent, by redefining terms or distoring history...
The point I was making was to support the argument I made that those putting on this little 'class' were doing so for their own amusement, and their attempts to justify it were ridiculous.. Their admission of their exhibitionism fetish, is 'evidence' of this.. not merely my speculation..
The fact that a lot of people do something is not an argument for the wisdom or morals behind or ethics of or against that behavior... It is only what it is, that a lot of people do something... There are literally millions of radical jihadists that want to subjugate me and you to sharia law.. but the fact that so many want to do this, is not an argument that it is a just or moral thing to do... If the sheer numbers of people engaged in a behavior or belief were an argument for the truth of that matter, then Christianity is true.. case closed, and you must submit to it... Because there are literally Billions who believe 'that'...
The above argument is one your mother should have taught you when you were a child... That 'everyone else is doing it' is not a reason that she should let 'you' do it.. And the fact that you made it is evidence f what I mean about how people are being taught 'what' to think, instead of 'how'..
Finally, you pointed to one thing you deemed bad behavior to justify another thing you deem bad behavior.. (and you did a piss poor job of it at that)... That is something else that your mother should have taught you as a child.. Pointing to someone elses bad behavior does not justify your bad behavior... Again more evidence that you have been taught 'what' to think, and not 'how' to think..
I gave you 'reasons' why this sort of stuff was not 'wise' to foist on 'blank slates'... blank slates who do not yet understand the impact of what they feed their minds with will have on their entire life... You attacked me back with 'emotional' arguments..
This is something you have been taught.. You have been programmed to 'bait' others into a name calling match to divert them from the actual topic being discussed... By attacking my character, this is what you are attempting to do..pervert normal debate/discussion of ideas.. it's a tactic used by those who have no real answer or argument of their own..
I judge whether things/philosophies/ideas are 'good' or 'bad' for my country, my fellow man, and my own life... by the fruit that the tree produces.. If the tree produces bad fruit, then I can 'deduce' that the tree (the idea/philosophy/worldview) that produced them is also bad...
That is as much as I am going to discuss this with 'you' as I can tell from your last post that it is 'you' who will not listen, and are as such unreachable.. and must be defeated... You can not be converted by logical debate, and so defeat or surrender are the only options.. surrender is not an option from where I sit.. so defeat it is..
My friends and I will see you at the ballot box... (and we way outnumber you, and have had enough of your BS and are taking our country back)
Cheers,
