so if you see and feel the scratch it's risky but if you don't it's not risky? that what is sounds like you are saying. i claim every plastic item used in homebrewing probably scratched. now, are there degrees of scratching that should cause alarm? the point i'm trying to make in this reasoned discussion (which i thank you for having

) is this: if you or anyone else thinks that a scratch bucket is risky then why not test it? it that not the best way to know for sure? testing theories/hypothesis is what science is all about and this seems to be a really easy one to test. i have yet to find a yeast or bacteria that was able to survive soap and star san or a scratch that could harbor said bacteria. the scratched bucket theory does make sense since it provides a very reasonable sounding explanation, a cognitive map if you will, for an event, a wild yeast/bacteria infection, that is of unknown origin. people want to know "where did it come from?" and the scratched bucket theory may satisfy that need. it makes sense that bacteria could hide if some tiny place: threads, corners, scratches and so on. i'm not disputing this what i'm saying is that having a scratch (not a deep gouge like i said before) or a rough surface is not taking any chances at all if you are cleaning and sanitizing your equipment. if you take a knife and bury it into the side of a fermentor the deepest point may be small enough for a bubble to form, in theory, and keep whatever is hiding there safe from harm but not a surface scratch or rough area from a file. i bet most infections come from sources outside the fermentor; our hands, mouth, hair, a valve or hose.
i am not wedded to my position and would certainly change my mind if the facts before me change but in the 3 years i've been fermenting sour beer using the same gear as my clean beer this has not happened even once. i would not consider myself lucky at this point, too many batches have been fermented for me to consider that i've merely been lucky.