MikeJones
Well-Known Member
I've never heard of SeaQuench Ale, so the press for it is probably overblown.
SeaQuench is great. Easily attainable and relatively cheap summer crusher.
I've never heard of SeaQuench Ale, so the press for it is probably overblown.
Sure, I get the light lager is reduced calorie wise. But I always thought of it as people care in that they can feel better/are able to more easily drink 12+ beers in a night type of way, not in a hugely caloric conscious type of way.At least when they started marketing the light lagers and they overtook the the regular Bud/Coors products as number one sellers somebody must have. Even something as recent as Miller 64 is marketed based on caloric content.
Initially I too thought ABInBev ran the nutrition info commercial for some sort of advantage/nefarious plot to show how much fewer calories their beer has compared to typical craft beers. Turns out 'the labels aren't legally required, but major beer makers agreed in 2016 to voluntarily disclose nutrition facts on their products by 2020.' One of many articles on it below.
Guess ABInBev just felt like really owning the fact they're meeting their promise and felt like touting it in a commercial.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/11/bud-light-debuts-bigger-nutrition-labels.html
The nefarious aspect doesn't lie in showing the caloric difference, it's that they're almost certainly lobbying to make it a requirement down the road. It costs virtually nothing per can of Miller Lite to run nutritional info, but for breweries with smaller production runs, frequently spread across many brands, it will be disproportionately onerous if it's ever made compulsory.Initially I too thought ABInBev ran the nutrition info commercial for some sort of advantage/nefarious plot to show how much fewer calories their beer has compared to typical craft beers. Turns out 'the labels aren't legally required, but major beer makers agreed in 2016 to voluntarily disclose nutrition facts on their products by 2020.' One of many articles on it below.
Guess ABInBev just felt like really owning the fact they're meeting their promise and felt like touting it in a commercial.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/11/bud-light-debuts-bigger-nutrition-labels.html
Yup, that was my first thought as well. I looked into nutritional analysis out of curiosity cause people kept asking but it's expensive as hell.I looked at it with more sinister intent. Start adding the information, hope it becomes required eventually, forcing everyone else to do expensive nutritional analysis for all their beers.
Agreed, I love it.SeaQuench is great. Easily attainable and relatively cheap summer crusher.
Not guilty enough to not do it.Do you have any idea how guilty i'm going to feel while pouring a black tuesday into an oversized snifter and read that it's 3200 calories off the back label
Not guilty enough to not do it.
**** it. Stick it to consumers and no brewery should release any new beer in 2019. Make them buy **** they've already drank.
Whether or not you're exaggerating/joking, there's actually another aspect of this that's already causing some ripples: breweries cannot get label approval even for beers that they already make (but didn't need label approval on before, because they were not distributed at all, or not distributed out-of-state) in order to bring them to festivals.
At least when they started marketing the light lagers and they overtook the the regular Bud/Coors products as number one sellers somebody must have. Even something as recent as Miller 64 is marketed based on caloric content.
Funky "Booty" (sellouts!) is on your way if you're driving down 95.We haven't finalized the plan but we'll at least pass through Islamorada. I'll check it out.
Eh, I don't need any foodbeers this time around (Inb4 "Why are you even going to Florida??") and we're flying into Miami so it's not on the way.Funky "Booty" (sellouts!) is on your way if you're driving down 95.
I eagerly await the Untappd badge for it, too.
“It’s almost as expensive per ounce as cocaine,”
To be fair, he did invent the extract IPAI love how he's acting like he invented brut IPA and gose
I mean he is a real foodbeer pioneer. Putting things in beer that just ain't right for a couple decades now.I love how he's acting like he invented brut IPA and gose
Stevia gives me the same ****** aftertaste as artificial sweeteners. I'm not sure if I've tried the monkfruit stuff, but it wouldn't surprise me if it also had a ****** aftertaste.i've had the 7bbl batch of slightly mighty at their tasting room and it smells great but has an off-putting aftertaste that i guess i'll attribute to the monkfruit. i'll be interested to see if that remains in the distributed version
Same. I have yet to find a sugar replacement that doesn't taste like garbage to me.Stevia gives me the same ****** aftertaste as artificial sweeteners. I'm not sure if I've tried the monkfruit stuff, but it wouldn't surprise me if it also had a ****** aftertaste.
Have you tried sugar, but, less?Same. I have yet to find a sugar replacement that doesn't taste like garbage to me.
The only mediocre Resilience I’ve had so far was at Great Notion. I think they were confused about when to add the lactose and maple syrupThat's one of the great things about all the Resilience versions out there. When done well it's like having SN fresher that I ever see it.
There's an option I'd be happy with. Usually when you see something labeled as having less sugar, they've just swapped part of the sugar with stevia or an artificial sweeteneer. Less sweet is not often a choice.Have you tried sugar, but, less?